Report: Girl in Weiner sexting case lied to damage Clinton

That's the "sexual-assaulter" face.
a0d.jpg
that's gold
 
>according to a report by the investigative news site WhoWhatWhy

WOW! consider weiner absolved
 
I´d be embarrassed to post this article, defending a perv over a 16 years old girl.

Who is defending him?

It's just a potential new development in a pretty significant news worthy event.

I dunno if it's true or not either, sources are shoddy atm.

We'll see if it gets any traction.
 
Not being democrats is not a new development, its even more fake than Russia hacked US elections.

This girl not being a minor in a case where she's supposed to be a minor is certainly a development.
 
>according to a report by the investigative news site WhoWhatWhy

WOW! consider weiner absolved

wikipedia said:
Russell Warren "Russ" Baker, is an American investigative journalist. He is the author of a 2008 book, Family of Secrets, that outlines what it claims are connections between President George H.W. Bush and the Watergate scandal and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He is also the founder of WhoWhatWhy, a journalism website.

He has had articles in a variety of publications, including The Village Voice, The Nation and The Christian Science Monitor, but recently has been published mainly on the Internet, to his own website and to AlterNet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_Baker

giphy.gif
 
Lol get over it, she lost.

The water works of tears never ends.

But in all fairness you should be happy. America has the male *pronoun* gender of her in office.
 
WAIT....Is the left VICTIM BLAMING now???


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!
 
Technically, he didn't, if this is true.

He can still be a scumbag without doing something illegal.

Well, he was technically investigated, technically charged with a crime, and will technically plead guilty.

You're technically a defender of some pretty sick shit....you fuckin' weirdo.
 
Wait a minute I thought it was the Russians???
 
The topics you choose to defend, is getting kind of creepy.

Muslim pedophilia, Anthony Wiener...

I'm noticing a pattern here.

He debated me on Islamic pedophilia, and his stance was that Muhammad was not a creepy pedo and the Islamic religion does not sanction pedophilia, then ran away when given primary sources as proof it clearly does. his name is a euphemism, like free speech zone, or some such nonsense.
 
Would it not be illegal to send unrequested dick picks anyways?
Technically, he didn't, if this is true.

He can still be a scumbag without doing something illegal.
Unless I'm mistaken, if she wasn't 18 it is still illegal for him to send a dick pic.
Well you are mistaken, age of consent varies by state it's not a universal 18. That said, weiner is still a creepy perv.

The question is do any liberal WR posters have tin foil strong enough to maintain a 40+ page thread on a vast GOP conspiracy to frame him? My guess is no. It's not at all unbelievable that this chick could have set him up, but imo it doesn't matter much even if true he's still a creep who had no problem sexting a (allegedly) 15 year old.

Actually, the law in this area is really fucking weird. For most federal sex crimes, age of consent laws track state laws for the jurisdiction they occur in. For child pornography cases, they do not.

For sending obscene photos to a minor, the law seems to be set at 16, not at local law.

Anyways, here's a good write-up on the topic:
https://www.popehat.com/2017/05/22/...ally-over-16-story-and-why-im-very-skeptical/

TLDR: The story in the OP is likely false, but if true, the girl and GOP people with whom she allegedly coordinated would be looking at felony charges. What would happen to Weiner is less clear, since he apparently already signed a plea agreement that stipulated to her age being 17, but he would probably be able to sue his attorneys for not doing their due diligence and build an appeal or habeas petition around that.
 
Last edited:
She prolly got a visit from some off-duty Arkansas state trooper in the middle of the night and changed her tune.
 
Actually, the law in this area is really fucking weird. For most federal sex crimes, age of consent laws track state laws for the jurisdiction they occur in. For child pornography cases, they do not.

For sending obscene photos to a minor, the law seems to be set at 16, not at local law.

Anyways, here's a good write-up on the topic:
https://www.popehat.com/2017/05/22/...ally-over-16-story-and-why-im-very-skeptical/

TLDR: The story in the OP is likely false, but if true, the girl and GOP people with whom she allegedly coordinated would be looking at felony charges.

So in theory I can just send dick picks to random 16 year olds and it is okay? Like there is no unwanted dick pic laws?
 
Actually, the law in this area is really fucking weird. For most federal sex crimes, age of consent laws track state laws for the jurisdiction they occur in. For child pornography cases, they do not.

For sending obscene photos to a minor, the law seems to be set at 16, not at local law.

Anyways, here's a good write-up on the topic:
https://www.popehat.com/2017/05/22/...ally-over-16-story-and-why-im-very-skeptical/

TLDR: The story in the OP is likely false, but if true, the girl and GOP people with whom she allegedly coordinated would be looking at felony charges.

Yeah I think it's probably bullshit too, I was surprised that the Hill picked it up, tbh.
 
I saw Anthony Weiner playing ice hockey once at Chelsea Piers Sky Rink in Manhattan. He is a goalie and plays in Div 3 or 4. I dont remember if before or after the scandal broke out.
 
Back
Top