- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 0
yeah, what would mean for us. and for them too, for the business. if maybe the sports side of the business would get more valued or even more undervalued
I pretty much answered it as best I could
MMA/Boxing/etc., is a very unpredictable business.
A Conor or a Floyd can make a huge difference in a year's profit & public profiler.
But without Conor, UFC is set up to be an ATM.
Now will more transparency & stockholder be good for the owners?
It is no secret fighter pay is low, but WWE is about 50% of UFC (pay % of rev) & they don't catch any shit.
But I can't see Dana being as loud publicly if they go to open market.
Will stockholders see him as a PRO or CON?
no idea