Real question, pornstars, and Playboy models, do you believe Trump never had an aborted baby?

[TheComebackKid]

The retarded part is how you interpret the question of if you've changed your mind on thinking that pro-choice people should be killed into what you describe above.

I wasn't asked that question tho numb nuts. I also don't think pro choice people should be killed. You sure you're not just being retarded?

 

[7437]

Nope

Its just more of a non issue? or is that just for Trump and no one else.
[QUOTE="TheComebackKid, post: 143133009, member: 138520" Its a non issue for me. [/QUOTE]

 

[Squarechoke]

I wasn't asked that question tho numb nuts. I also don't think pro choice people should be killed. You sure you're not just being retarded?

I did ask you that question. Twice now. When I saw you comment in this thread I knew that this would be yet another case where your fake Christian gimmick wasn't holding up so for laughs I spent half a minute searching and found a post of you saying that, just as expected. You have never been bright enough to keep your gimmick consistent.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Its just more of a non issue? or is that just for Trump and no one else.
[QUOTE="TheComebackKid, post: 143133009, member: 138520" Its a non issue for me.

[/QUOTE]

It's a non issue if Trump had an abortion at some point. If he did them that's wrong and something he has to answer for at the time of judgement. But in regards to roe v wade being overturned or something along those lines...it just doesn't matter.

 

[TheComebackKid]

I did ask you that question. Twice now. When I saw you comment in this thread I knew that this would be yet another case where your fake Christian gimmick wasn't holding up so for laughs I spent half a minute searching and found a post of you saying that, just as expected. You have never been bright enough to keep your gimmick consistent.

Well if I said that I was wrong. I don't believe that and never have. Now what?

 

[Squarechoke]

Well if I said that I was wrong. I don't believe that and never have. Now what?

It would just prove my point, you can't keep your gimmick consistent.

 

[TheComebackKid]

It would just prove my point, you can't keep your gimmick consistent.

It's a gimmick when I say abortion is wrong?

 

[Squarechoke]

It's a gimmick when I say abortion is wrong?

As I mentioned above I'm referring to your fake Christianity gimmick. One post god is of the utmost importance, and in the next it's inferior to being more efficient in the government of our Earthly lives. Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate the entertainment. Sometimes I just help it a long a bit.

 

[TheComebackKid]

As I mentioned above I'm referring to your fake Christianity gimmick. One post god is of the utmost importance, and in the next it's inferior to being more efficient in the government of our Earthly lives. Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate the entertainment. Sometimes I just help it a long a bit.

Lol, what a retarded mess.

 

[Squarechoke]

Lol, what a retarded mess.

Yes, but that's what makes you funny.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Yes, but that's what makes you funny.

So if I were a real Christian in your opinion what should my stance be on repealing roe v wade?

 

[weed]

switch 'Trump' with 'Obama'.

I Care. Excellent question.

 

[Squarechoke]

So if I were a real Christian in your opinion what should my stance be on repealing roe v wade?

You would at least not say that pro-choice people should be killed, like you did before.

 

[TheComebackKid]

You would at least not say that pro-choice people should be killed, like you did before.

Go ahead and post the quote

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

I really don't think I need to make the case that i own myself.

As was once said, some truths are self evident.

Well you'd be wrong. You don't own yourself legally OR ethically. The self evident truths are endowed in us by our creator.

If you wanna go the legal route. Show where humans are property?

 

[VivaRevolution]

Well you'd be wrong. You don't own yourself legally OR ethically. The self evident truths are endowed in us by our creator.

If you wanna go the legal route. Show where humans are property?

The argument isn't that humans are property, it is that you have complete and total sovereignty over your own body.

Want evidence of this. Let's look to language.

Let's break down the word myself.

my
mī/
determiner
possesive pronoun: my

1. 1.
   belonging to or associated with the speaker

self
self/
noun

1. 1.
   a person's essential being that distinguishes them from others, especially considered as the object of introspection or reflexive action

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

The argument isn't that humans are property, it is that you have complete and total sovereignty over your own body.

Want evidence of this. Let's look to language.

Let's break down the word myself.

my
mī/
determiner
possesive pronoun: my

1. 1.
   belonging to or associated with the speaker

self
self/
noun

1. 1.
   a person's essential being that distinguishes them from others, especially considered as the object of introspection or reflexive action

And why does a human fetus not have this sovereignty?

The mother compromised her sovereignty when she had sex because that's how babies are made and we all know that.

The baby did nothing to intrude. It simply existed

 

[VivaRevolution]

And why does a human fetus not have this sovereignty?

The mother compromised her sovereignty when she had sex because that's how babies are made and we all know that.

The baby did nothing to intrude. It simply existed

No.

That is not reality.

Reality is that we scramble the brain, because just throwing the baby out the womb would be inhumane.

The baby cant live without the womb.

This is what I was trying to get at with the rhetoric of baby killer vs fascist.

It is rhetoric, but good rhetoric is partially true.

Because the baby can't live without the womb, we get a choice to make. The life of a baby, or the women's liberty. That is the debate in terms that respect the others point of view. Or we can start throwing shit at each other like monkeys, and start calling each other baby killer and fascist as we parry for the moral high ground.

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

No.

That is not reality.

Reality is that we scramble the brain, because just throwing the baby out the womb would be inhumane.

The baby cant live without the womb.

This is what I was trying to get at with the rhetoric of baby killer vs fascist.

It is rhetoric, but good rhetoric is partially true.

Because the baby can't live without the womb, we get a choice to make. The life of a baby, or the women's liberty. That is the debate in terms that respect the others point of view. Or we can start throwing shit at each other like monkeys, and start calling each other baby killer and fascist as we parry for the moral high ground.

You still fail to acknowledge the woman had a choice to have sex or not. Nobody is forcing the woman to have a baby. They are simply not allowing her to kill it

 

[VivaRevolution]

You still fail to acknowledge the woman had a choice to have sex or not. Nobody is forcing the woman to have a baby. They are simply not allowing her to kill it

Here is the thing man. If you are the lead by example, real deal boot strap picker-upperer, who actually believes let he who is without sin cast the first stone, then you should be OK with YOUR eternal salvation being intact, and your legally protected right to proselytise.

Don't forget that what makes Chrsitianity superior to the dark ages Muslims is that you don't want a caliphate. You coexist fine with those that don't share your beliefs.