I wouldn't go as far to say everything he brings up is legit.
Care to bring up what was not legit?
Was I wrong in saying that Roman Reigns was not the guy?
Was I wrong in saying Roman's super man push was bad for the rest of the roster? (League of Nations says hello. A group that should gave been awesome but it was really made to just make Roman look strong)
Was I wrong that Pro Wrestling is out of touch?
Was I wrong in saying that this whole Brock last boss gimmick(which ties directly into the Roman push) was horrible for the rest of the roster too?(Orton, Braun and Joe say hello)
Was I wrong in saying that the WWE shouldn't go for one top guy anymore but rather a few so they can constantly keep things fresh?
Was I wrong in saying that ratings do matter?
Was I wrong to say that Network numbers are bad and that @TheStruggle, @The Higher Power and yourself resorted to unpaid subscribers in attempt to make Roman look more over then he really is? Or how about using Mania ticket sales to justify his push as if nobody else existed on the same card..?
Come back when you have a "legit" argument rather then a sentance with zero proof whatsoever of what you're saying.. Unlike you, I'm a realist, I see things how they really are and not how I wish them to be. People just don't like hearing the damn truth and thats not my problem.