Just finished Star Trek Voyager for the third time, good to have something to move on to...can't wait to look through 100s of hours of carefully edited footage designed to expose CNN for being guilty of carefully editing footage.
can't wait to look through 100s of hours of carefully edited footage designed to expose CNN for being guilty of carefully editing footage.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2011/10/24/updated-the-lies-of-james-okeefe/183780
Lying ass James O'Keefe, these tapes should be awesome. I bet he puts CNN behind the grassy knoll.
I don't need a known liar to tell me CNN violated public trust during the presidential election.*Uses Media Matters to Prove James O'Keefe is a liar, is like citing Fox News calling Obama a Liar
*Uses Media Matters to Prove James O'Keefe is a liar, is like citing Fox News calling Obama a Liar
Very relevant comment. Anyone who pays attention to Clinton News Network at this point is a zombie re: Dawn of the DeadWikileaks already proved it
The only people who don't believe CNN isn't a propaganda network
A) doesn't look to the internet and won't see this
B) willfully ignorant due to bias
C) don't care because Fox News does the same thing, as if you can't hate both networks
It's pretty funny. MediaMatters is funded by Soros, and works closely with Center for American Progress, his other org. In 2010, he donated a million to MM to go after Fox, and prevent the potential Murdoch/Time Warner merger. In 2017, according to their leaked pamphlet, they got a 13 million dollar budget. Their main focus for 2020 will be censoring independent, self-funded media that does not go along with globalist narratives (or worse, fights them).
O'Keefe has literally never committed fraud of any sort. Trust this man 100%, he'd never doctor up a tape for his own shifty purposes.
O'Keefe is literally fake news. Proven many times.
can't wait to look through 100s of hours of carefully edited footage designed to expose CNN for being guilty of carefully editing footage.
Tapes are from 2009, they're asking other people to go through them. I'll remove "apparent" upon getting more info or verification.
So we're no longer judging them on their published content, but their personal conversations? Doesn't sound at all like 1984.
So we're no longer judging them on their published content, but their personal conversations? Doesn't sound at all like 1984.