Prime for Prime...could Roger be competitive against Serena

in a match if they played


1498866230554.jpg

1498866277241.jpg
Serena Williams would definitely defeat Roger Ebert...since Ebert is dead. She would lose to Roger Rabbit because he's animated and he's a rabbit so he can cover ground much faster and rabbits have even more fast twitch muscle fiber than Serena.

Now if you are talking Roger Federer against Serena? The chances of Serena defeating Roger Federer in an actual tennis match is about the same as Roger Ebert defeating Serena Williams in a tennis match right now. So yes, this is a stupid question, far worse than the stupid MMA heads who thought Ronda Rousey had a shot at defeating 135lb UFC male fighters.
 
Federer at 14 would have beat Serena in her absolute prime. 6-0 6-0, and 6-0 if they didn't play best of 3 women's rules.
 
conor has a much better chance at beating Floyd than serena ever would have against federer
 
conor has a much better chance at beating Floyd than serena ever would have against federer
Boxing vs mma boxing is actually pretty comparable IMO, to Men's vs Women's Tennis. The absolute best boxer in the UFC wouldn't come close to cracking the top 100 in the world in boxing.
 
I agree. the reason I say that is there is a slight chance conor gets in one devastating blow that ends it. in a tennis match, serena has to win a LOT of mini battles. no way she would do that
 
What's the reason for the heat? Do people disagree with the statement or is it hate speech to state the obvious now? Venus can easily beat over 3,000,000,000 men but she'd have no shot at the best 500 men in the world. Is this really controversial?
Only in the world where it's not wrong to use the term ladies and gentlemen because it's offensive.
 
Back
Top