- Joined
- Apr 18, 2016
- Messages
- 5,683
- Reaction score
- 7,123
Amazing short speech about immigration at Sweden Parliament
I'm not part of that group, if that is a thing. I've known Catholics who fully agree and believe in the doctrine of salvation. Which is exactly what you need to have correct if you proclaim to be saved.
If you look within the Christian community itself, there are literally hundreds of different types. Basically all types agree on the doctrine of salvation, but then have different interpretations for everything else.
What? I didn't get that sense at all. Didn't he say atheists and Muslim can go to heaven? Didn't he even wash the feet of Muslim refugees? I think he means that the refugees should not just be quarantined in a camp or a ghetto.
i feel like theres an overlooked problem with taking in tons of refugees
the whole argument is that there are "good guys" who get victimized by the "bad guys" in the middle east. so we should let the "good guys" move in with us to save them, right?
what the fuck is the long term plan for the middle east then? make it so that it is only filled with homicidal maniacs and terrorists? how will things ever "settle down" or get under control if everyone who isnt a murderer leaves? who is supposed to take control and rebuild a civilized country?
If the *symbolism* happens to be paganism then yes I do care, because for a *church* going against God's word isn't a good way to communicate the Lord's message.For someone who claims to be against symbolism, you clearly care a lot about it.
Christianity spread in the world through ecumenism, Jesus was not Italian, nor spoke latin, christianism expanded in part by adapting older religions into the christian faith, thats why you can see a lot of "paganism" in the church.
You want to go fundie like ISIS then you should go preach in Arameic and give mass on a rock like Jesus did.
If the *symbolism* happens to be paganism then yes I do care, because for a *church* going against God's word isn't a good way to communicate the Lord's message.
Wrong. Christianity spreads by the preaching of the Word, nothing more, nothing less. Wrong again, Christians did not adapt other *older* religions into them. Maybe the *catholics* did, but a true Christian organization follows the precepts laid down in the New Testament, particularly via the book of Acts for sound church foundation.
Trust me I do my share of representing my faith. I even do it here in these forums.
Put your money where your mouth is, Frank, bring a bunch into Vatican city.
is the Pope accepting a bunch of refugees at the Vatican?
Translation let everyone into the cathedrals and fill them up so their will be no homeless in the world. Italy will soon topple China and India in terms of population...................................
is the Pope accepting a bunch of refugees at the Vatican?
Help you fellow man, but do it intelligently. I don't see what there is to disagree with here.
The Pope is 100% correct. But of course there is the typical shertard that disagrees without reading a single word of the article.
i feel like theres an overlooked problem with taking in tons of refugees
the whole argument is that there are "good guys" who get victimized by the "bad guys" in the middle east. so we should let the "good guys" move in with us to save them, right?
what the fuck is the long term plan for the middle east then? make it so that it is only filled with homicidal maniacs and terrorists? how will things ever "settle down" or get under control if everyone who isnt a murderer leaves? who is supposed to take control and rebuild a civilized country?
That's because we are good goyims and do what they tell us. Actually, they manufacture these feel-good feelings through the MSM/social media and the open-order libtards bask in the how virtuous they must be by allowing these poor "refugees" in. Libs have no sense of the long term, but the appeal to emotion is strong and they know it. In time they may learn the folly of their ways but I doubt it.Somehow global initiatives never follow through and it is only the Western European and Anglo countries which follow through.
A major concern is that the Kremlin has seeded the migrants with secret operatives who will be activated once they reach Europe.
Warsaw has “credible multi-source information” on this, including intelligence from U.S. and British spy partners, indicating that Russian intelligence services have sent Illegals to Syria, then on to Europe, posing as Middle East refugees. They are destined for several EU countries, including Germany, France and Britain.
“We’ll never be able to select SVR Illegals out from the masses of refugees,” explained a Pentagon intelligence official. “They would beat our immigration vetting, and we’re stronger there than most of Europe.”