- Joined
- Jan 9, 2017
- Messages
- 4,977
- Reaction score
- 0
Lol, Perry fans are whiny little bitches.
but your knee cap would be kicked in. you think others havent thought of that? lol. getting mad doesnt make you good. doesnt matter if your bitch feelings are hurt. that wont save you.
1. That's an assumption.Ponzi wasn't landing before it, Mike was using his head movement surprisingly well, looked much faster than Ponzi. The blood came right after the poke, Ponzi didnt land anything to cause it other than the poke. It had an effect and fighters can't call time out, the ref is supposed to do that. (1)Ponzi had to blind Mike to be able to land anything effective.
I'm not saying they should overturn the fight, (2)They just really need to watch out for that shit, especially when a fighter is known for it. If that eye poke didn't happen there is a possibility we would have gotten an awesome fight with Mike Perry vs Darren Till.
Proof?Take away the eye pokes and he's not 3-0 his last three fights. Karma is coming for Ponzi...
I
If it had been the other way around, Perry would be called a cheating poker. Instead we get this Ponzinibbio and people defending his pokes.
I agree, it is almost impossible to poke someone in the eye, when you are locked in the cage with them for 15 minutes, like, how would you be able to touch their face when your fingers are free and you have like 500 attempts to actually land an eyepokeThey're moving so fast in there it's hard to intentionally poke someone. Some fighter's like to have one or both palms open and it's up to the ref to warn them.
You sound like a real badass. I'm not sure if you're more of a pussy or an imbecile, but definitely a sizeable amount of each.
his eye was bleeding from it, its moronic to pretend an eye poke doesn't have any effect on a fight, same with a kick to the nuts. shit throws you off. mind you my competing days was TKD I get its not the sameIt's bad when someone does it. It's disfgraceful if it there is a pattern behind it.
However this one looked harmless to me. Perry wiped his eye like once and did not seem to be bothered at all.
If you say it had any effect on the fight and the result then you are really reaching imo. The momentum shifted when Ponz started tagging Perry over and over.
lol man, you clearly have never been poked in the eye man or been in a fight. Stop talking its getting hard to read. we get it you think perry sucksSo a cut around the eye?
Quite common and usually not an issue if under the eye.
It obviously did not leak into the eye.
I am not saying that nothing happened. My argument is that it did not have an effect on the fight. And a minor cut that does not leak blood into the eyes does not have an effect.
It's bad when someone does it. It's disfgraceful if it there is a pattern behind it.
However this one looked harmless to me. Perry wiped his eye like once and did not seem to be bothered at all.
If you say it had any effect on the fight and the result then you are really reaching imo. The momentum shifted when Ponz started tagging Perry over and over.
I like this. You poke someones eye next 10fights with closed gloves.Agreed. At a minimum, force those who have poked eyes repeatedly to start wearing them.
Why do people keep saying that? He had a cut below the eye. His eye was not bleeding.his eye was bleeding from it, its moronic to pretend an eye poke doesn't have any effect on a fight, same with a kick to the nuts. shit throws you off. mind you my competing days was TKD I get its not the same
In his last 3 fights, the momentum shifted after he eye poked his last 3 opponents: Mike Perry, Gunnar Nelson and Taleb Nordine. I'm curious to know if he did it in previous bout. Referees really need to watch out for those in his next fights.
you said an eye poke has no effect, your either being bias or your just incredibly stupid I gave you the benefit of the doubt and chose bias.Why do people keep saying that? He had a cut below the eye. His eye was not bleeding.
And I never said that an eyepoke does not have an effect. I said the effect of this one in particular is being overrated. He wiped his eye once.
That is my opinion. As opposed to many people arguing Perry lost because of it.
Even Perry said he has to work on his cardio. He slowed down and got more sloppy in the second. That's when his opponent started landing good shots.
And of course you have to assume that I am biased against Perry because I disagree with the excuse.
I agree, it is almost impossible to poke someone in the eye, when you are locked in the cage with them for 15 minutes, like, how would you be able to touch their face when your fingers are free and you have like 500 attempts to actually land an eyepoke
Haha no I did not.you said an eye poke has no effect, your either being bias or your just incredibly stupid I gave you the benefit of the doubt and chose bias.
Oblique kicks are a serious bitch move. If some guy were looking me in the eye while squared up and continuously throwing front kicks to the knee of my lead leg, my only desire would be to slam him to the ground and choke him to death.