@Jack V Savage
Do you disagree with any of my predictions?
We don't think the same way, I guess. Here are your predictions:
:
- Trump will not lose the 2020 Republican primary contest.
- If Trump makes it to election day 2020, he will win re-election.
- Trump will not be indicted for any crimes while in office.
- Robert Mueller's investigation will not conclude that Trump attempted to offer US policy concessions to Russia in exchange for access to the hacked DNC e-mails.
- Martin O'Malley, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, and Kirsten Gillibrand will all announce candidacies for president for 2020.
- Cory Booker will not be the Democratic nominee in 2020.
- The Republicans will hold the Senate in the 2018 election.
- Trump will not be removed from office via political means (e.g., 25th Amendment, impeachment+removal)
- During the Democratic primary race for the 2020 US presidential election, one of Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Martin O'Malley or Bernie Sanders or their respective presidential campaigns will criticize Kirsten Gillibrand publicly for her past positions on illegal immigration.
Your first one is less of a lock than it usually is (a sitting president hasn't lost the nomination since 1884, and an elected president hasn't lost the nomination since 1852), but I'd still give it a 95% or so chance of being right.
The second one is tough to judge. The incumbent has a big advantage generally, especially if the economy is doing well, but Trump is unusually bad and unpopular considering the state of the economy (I don't think people appreciate how fortunate he's been--his still-low approval ratings are being propped up by the economy). If there's a downturn, he's toast. If not, he could still lose. Since we don't know what the economy will be doing in 2020, that's hard to predict, but I'd bet against him at even odds. Your confidence is just wishful thinking.
The third one is a matter of legal controversy that I can't weigh in on. Plus, while evidence that would justify an indictment for someone who isn't the president is considerably more likely than not, it's not 100%.
I don't see any basis for judging your fourth one. I think, again, you're letting tribalism cloud your judgment.
Your fifth one is the kind of prediction that people who don't really get probability make a lot. If three of them have a 95% chance of running and one of them has a 60% chance, your odds are barely better than even. I don't really know the chances for them individually, but I'd guess that they're all better than even chances.
Booker probably doesn't win, true. At this point, no one would be favored over the field collectively, and Booker isn't even the frontrunner (last I saw, five other candidates had better odds than him, none of them close to even).
I believe Republicans are favored to keep the Senate at this point, though the odds are very close. I don't know enough to challenge the consensus here.
I've said from the beginning that I have zero respect for the integrity of Republicans in Congress (or obviously in the Executive Branch). Public opinion could swing them, but Trump was right when he said he could murder someone and not lose you guys as supporters. So I'd agree with this one.
That last one is impossible to predict.