- Joined
- May 18, 2012
- Messages
- 3,550
- Reaction score
- 213
No it shouldn't, if gunners eye was bugging him he should've indicated it and the ref would be given him timeQuit over reacting you little woman.
Should be a NC though.
No it shouldn't, if gunners eye was bugging him he should've indicated it and the ref would be given him timeQuit over reacting you little woman.
Should be a NC though.
thisman, you sure are a bright one, no shit he didn't drop from eye pokes, that is not the point lmao... The point is that a fighter who has both eyes gouged at multiple times during a short amount of time will be reacting not to the strikes but to the eye pokes, hence not being able to judge distance properly due to obscured vision.
I dont think anyone is questioning that there was a KO involved in teh match, its just simply how someone can foul another fighter 4 times and not get punished but get rewarded for it all with in a round is just absurd. I couldn't give 2 fucks about Nelson, but with that video proof, holy hell i dont comprehend how anyone can even defend that.
Yes, it's an over reaction.
NC it and rematch them.
Resign Paul Harris, overreaction that he was holding on too long no reason to cut him and ban him
No it shouldn't, if gunners eye was bugging him he should've indicated it and the ref would be given him time
I'd rather have a bum knee than be blind.Not even comparable.
I'd rather have a bum knee than be blind.
Honestly it should be a No Contest, but wanting him banned is ridiculous.
Honestly it should be a No Contest, but wanting him banned is ridiculous.