Pearson vs Guillard : Illegal knees or not ?

[Tabarnakos]

I make the thread. You decide

 

[CannonsHeel]

Legal. Stupid intentional hand touching shouldn't count.

 

[wlu29]

Nope

 

[Sink0]

The one that caused the cut was indisputably illegal.

 

[benjaminbuttons]

legal

while hes throwing the second knee Ross puts his hand down.

 

[Takun]

Either way I'm tried of that fucking rule...oh my fingers are grazing the canvas? ILLEGAL

 

[waggy]

NO.

Pearson was raising it and when the knee thrown try to put it down. I consider that cheating.

 

[Michael13]

2nd was illegal.........so Rogan shouting to Melvin that it was legal was really unprofessional.

 

[Lew_Boy]

The cut was caused by the illegal knee.

 

[Winston Wolf]

Looked illegal to me. And Goddard is one of the best refs.

 

[wlu29]

British gotta protect their own

 

[TatesBeauty**]

Legal. The most retarded rule in MMA today. This is why people don't throw knees anymore for takedown defense. You have to time them perfectly or illegal.

 

[Momentosis]

1-1

 

[Dejch]

illegal or not, rule with hand on the kanvas so u can not knee is stupid...

 

[Chramelated]

2nd technically looked illegal, but I agree with people saying to get rid of that stupid rule.

 

[BEATDOWNS]

first one was illegal imo but the rules is dumb so what can you do.

 

[Jackpot]

Seems legal

 

[Still Holdin]

Legal and bs stoppage (havnt seen the cut close up)

 

[Koscheck24]

That ticker kept blocking my view. The 1st was close, the 2nd was very illegal. Could Pearson not continue?

 

[BobsyaUncle]

Correct decision.

See Nakamoto vs. Duke.