- Joined
- May 14, 2004
- Messages
- 9,357
- Reaction score
- 5,290
Again with this gif. Dude stop.
Again with this gif. Dude stop.
Real men take action. Reading is for sissies and spinsters.Look, the first broseph to show up didn't even read the survey before impugning it.
#MAGA one moron at a time.
Again with this gif. Dude stop.
42?
I would like to hear from REAL economists working in the real world.
Real men take action. Reading is for sissies and spinsters.
I'd also guess they have plenty of work experience. I'm making an assumption here, but it would be weird if professors from these institutions didn't considering my own professors did.Lol.
You really expect they will say anything different?
(BTW, many top economists ARE professors or heads of departments. It is one of the more sought after positions in the field.)
This is an amazingly accurate comparison of how Führer Trump came to power.
Shush! It's all he's got.Again with this gif. Dude stop.
Serious question, how many of those economists predicted the market would crash if Trump won?
Lot of truth to this. Republicans are bad on tax policy, not just Trump. I have no doubt a Romney type would pass and equally regressive and bad tax plan. And republicans down the line hate the individual mandate.@Madmick or @panamaican what is the difference between this tax plan and a tax plan that would have been proposed under a Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio presidencies? I imagine since legislation is written by Congress, and that Congress would have the same general makeup under say a Bush presidency they would all be roughly similar. I haven't heard that Trump has exhorted some sort of undue influence on members of Congress to shape this bill in his own image, so far it appears Trump pretty much just pushes whatever Paul Ryan shows him. It looks like the pretty standard "moderate" conservative tax plan we could expect under any Republican presidency.
Thus, isn't the failing in the GOP tax bill as described by these economists not Trump's limited input but that the current moderate conservative tax doctrine is inherently damaging to the economy?
I fail to see how Trump uniquely impacted this bill which makes it a bad choice, but another Republican president would have been able to use his "influence" to convince Paul Ryan and friends to draft something that similarly follows party doctrine, but isn't damaging.
Seems to me you can't be conservative and think this bill is somehow uniquely terrible considering its what is to be expected from pretty much any conservative administration.
Top 42 economists? Or top 42 Marxist economists?
How can you tell he is flying towards a mountain? for what reason? and how do you know he is packing parachutes when you cant parachute from a commercial plane anyway?
This is an amazingly accurate comparison of how Führer Trump came to power.
"Goooolllllld is the only true money . . ."Time to buy gold and bitcoin.
The economy is rolling ONLY because Trump is publicly pro-business.