- Joined
- May 20, 2016
- Messages
- 34,432
- Reaction score
- 15,874
I prefer this to wasting time dealing with "clumsily appropriate Native American struggle" when, first, I probably have considerably more Native American blood in me than you, and second, one doesn't require to "appropriate" another race's hardships in order to illuminate the flawed defensive logic of a movement that ignored them altogether in the first place.
You almost certainly have more Native American blood than I do, as I have none to my knowledge. However, that's completely irrelevant. You brought up Native American plight to obfuscate an issue (disproportionate police violence) that does not really affect them.
I could, in response to Latino protest about immigration/employment discrimination or in response to Muslim protest about religious discrimination, say "WAHHHH, black people get discriminated against just as much!" but that would be silly, since those two groups uniquely face problems with those areas that black folks don't. And to beckon that the organization must be expanded to encompass black people's problems as well would require that the cause be expanded to effect a more general redistribution of power and capital along racial lines.
And, yes, it is humorous to me that you're so blatantly contradicting yourself on this issue: both bitching about the subterfuge of racial wealth distribution being represented as police violence reform, and wanting a level of inclusion that would more or less require that racial wealth distribution be the goal.