Had Icho made a transition let's say 4 years ago, that would have been something. For sure..What is interesting is that probably the best paid athletes in Japan are their "amateur" wrestlers. They have been so dominate the past decade in the world championships and the Olympics there is a reason why they aren't crossing move to MMA as much.
Yeah it's pretty ridiculous people act like an athlete can just "choose" which sport to be good at as if people don't have aptitude for different things - the all-encompassing "athleticism" myth.Re money & careers, you don't just choose to be a pro at mma, tennis or hoops. You've gotta start with talent & dedication.
Yeah it's pretty ridiculous people act like an athlete can just "choose" which sport to be good at as if people don't have aptitude for different things - the all-encompassing "athleticism" myth.
Athleticism is both general and specific, and frequently features neural factors of which the layman is ignorant. Take something basic, such as strength which is measured by 1RM. By changing two factors - all other things being equal - you can have either a great weightlifter or great powerlifter, but not both. Someone with great motor unit recruitment, able to activate a large number of muscle fibers, is generally very strong but not necessarily explosive, so would be a good powerlifter. The same individual with a lower degree of motor unit recruitment but greater degrees of rate coding and rate of force development is far more explosive, and would be a superior weightlifter. So the powerlifter type would be a better grappler whereas the weightlifter type would be a better striker (one being more explosive and the other being slightly stronger) but please note I am discussing only those two out of a multitude of factors.
The problem when things like genetics and athleticism are discussed on the internet - and particularly the main forum here - is that people know next to nothing about what they are talking about.
Athleticism is both general and specific, and frequently features neural factors of which the layman is ignorant. Take something basic, such as strength which is measured by 1RM. By changing two factors - all other things being equal - you can have either a great weightlifter or great powerlifter, but not both. Someone with great motor unit recruitment, able to activate a large number of muscle fibers, is generally very strong but not necessarily explosive, so would be a good powerlifter. The same individual with a lower degree of motor unit recruitment but greater degrees of rate coding and rate of force development is far more explosive, and would be a superior weightlifter. So the powerlifter type would be a better grappler whereas the weightlifter type would be a better striker (one being more explosive and the other being slightly stronger) but please note I am discussing only those two out of a multitude of factors.
The problem when things like genetics and athleticism are discussed on the internet - and particularly the main forum here - is that people know next to nothing about what they are talking about.
Has anyone mentioned that Loma won gold at IFMA, bring on atomweight.
Not sure what happened with Mazo, ref stopped it in the second against the tall Swede,
I had mentioned in an earlier post wrestling is more of an short explosive spurts versus running where you maintain a steady pace. Yes, there is different ways of being athletic and genetics.
A lot of the female wrestlers come from wrestling families, and Gina Carano's father was a football player, who was also in that explosive short spurts category.
Anybody know what hotel Invicta usually books for the fighters? I’m thinking of going to the July event, and staying there would make it easier to stalk.... um, er..... meet and greet the fighters.
Athleticism is both general and specific, and frequently features neural factors of which the layman is ignorant. Take something basic, such as strength which is measured by 1RM. By changing two factors - all other things being equal - you can have either a great weightlifter or great powerlifter, but not both. Someone with great motor unit recruitment, able to activate a large number of muscle fibers, is generally very strong but not necessarily explosive, so would be a good powerlifter. The same individual with a lower degree of motor unit recruitment but greater degrees of rate coding and rate of force development is far more explosive, and would be a superior weightlifter. So the powerlifter type would be a better grappler whereas the weightlifter type would be a better striker (one being more explosive and the other being slightly stronger) but please note I am discussing only those two out of a multitude of factors.
The problem when things like genetics and athleticism are discussed on the internet - and particularly the main forum here - is that people know next to nothing about what they are talking about.
Yeah it's pretty ridiculous people act like an athlete can just "choose" which sport to be good at as if people don't have aptitude for different things - the all-encompassing "athleticism" myth.
All the non Cyborg fans this might be some good news. If Cyborg leaves It would not bother me much. However, this raises some interesting questions. If she leaves will the UFC Keep the 145 division? Would the 145 division without Cyborg be more competitive and more interesting when the top 5 is established?
Well, it couldn't get any less competitive that's for sure. Cyborg has had such a stranglehold on the division for so long it would be very interesting to see how it would shake out without her. UFC Champ Megan Anderson has a pretty nice ring to it doesn't it?