- Joined
- Mar 22, 2008
- Messages
- 11,124
- Reaction score
- 218
Someone must be triggered, you seem a little high strung there...Yes, the topic being the article and the complete non-story contained with in. But you're desperately avoiding it to talk in generalities because you know the OP is shit.
Now read the article and tell us in what way. As made clear in the article, it's in no way that effects results or signals voter fraud from either side.
About this article, yes, because it's not a sign of voter fraud at all. And this thread is about that article.
Lol what facts are we missing? Do enlighten us on what the article concludes with.
Your confusing 'righteous' with 'literate'. But I can see why you'd mistake the latter for the former.
It's more.obvious the less you hackishly try to deflect.
From this, not really. We'll get some good ones, but this article is about nothing that can affect results or points to a party. It's someone finding a mistake and calling it intentional corruption, just to make sure this week's talking points are covered. The article says as much.
I'm not making any definitive statements other than the registrations have been altered. I never said it was the democrats or the republicans that did anything, yet you're happy to jump to conclusions.
The whole OP thing is deflection because I thought you meant poster instead of post? Wow, ok then.
Sounds like your basically just attacking me because I'm not steadfastly agreeing with every word or theory you have...Classic leftist, here folks.