Official: Thousands of Indiana voter registrations altered

Yes, the topic being the article and the complete non-story contained with in. But you're desperately avoiding it to talk in generalities because you know the OP is shit.



Now read the article and tell us in what way. As made clear in the article, it's in no way that effects results or signals voter fraud from either side.




About this article, yes, because it's not a sign of voter fraud at all. And this thread is about that article.



Lol what facts are we missing? Do enlighten us on what the article concludes with. :)



Your confusing 'righteous' with 'literate'. But I can see why you'd mistake the latter for the former.



It's more.obvious the less you hackishly try to deflect.



From this, not really. We'll get some good ones, but this article is about nothing that can affect results or points to a party. It's someone finding a mistake and calling it intentional corruption, just to make sure this week's talking points are covered. The article says as much.
Someone must be triggered, you seem a little high strung there...

I'm not making any definitive statements other than the registrations have been altered. I never said it was the democrats or the republicans that did anything, yet you're happy to jump to conclusions.

The whole OP thing is deflection because I thought you meant poster instead of post? Wow, ok then.

Sounds like your basically just attacking me because I'm not steadfastly agreeing with every word or theory you have...Classic leftist, here folks.
 
Gee, I wonder why you left out the rest of the article. LOL

The pandering to those on the far right with an aversion to reading more than a paragraph here is a true accomplishment in modern political discussions.
You're putting a lot of effort into putting me in a box, yet I've not said whether I agree with the article or not....I've really only been asking you questions...
Speaking of deflecting are you ready to address the DNC inciting violence at protests and rallies? There was just that bombing as well....seems the Dems are the party of violence...thoughts?
 
Someone must be triggered, you seem a little high strung there...

LOL.. It's like the official whiteflag wave for stupid people here.

I'm not making any definitive statements other than the registrations have been altered.

You just keep forgetting "in a way that can't possibly affect votes" after the word 'altered'. Because you're desperately trying to spin this into something it's not.

I never said it was the democrats or the republicans that did anything, yet you're happy to jump to conclusions.

Read the first few replies, and read what I first posted. The only jumping was you, to the defense of someone who had already drawn his slanted conclusion. Dumbass lol

The whole OP thing is deflection because I thought you meant poster instead of post? Wow, ok then.

Oh, so you are retarded. LOL! That wasn't what I was talking about at all there. I'd tell you what I did mean, but watching you struggle to get it... is funner.

Sounds like your basically just attacking me because I'm not steadfastly agreeing with every word or theory you have...Classic leftist, here folks.

....he said to the conservative, who's telling him a story about him being too fucking dumb to read an article and get it.

Classic this one single dumbass....
 
From this, not really. We'll get some good ones, but this article is about nothing that can affect results or points to a party. It's someone finding a mistake and calling it intentional corruption, just to make sure this week's talking points are covered. The article says as much.
Yeah people are always making a big deal out of old, poorly-maintained rolls. That's also where most of the "dead man voting" horseshit comes from. Could be an error too. Indiana pointing their finger at a black voter registration group who has been in conflict with them though. It seems really corrupt.
 
You're putting a lot of effort into putting me in a box, yet I've not said whether I agree with the article or not....

No, you clearly haven't even read the article. And that's what this thread is about. So... why the fuck are you even here?

've really only been asking you questions...

Oh, it's to stalk me. Yikes.

Speaking of deflecting are you ready to address the DNC inciting violence at protests and rallies? There was just that bombing as well....seems the Dems are the party of violence...thoughts?

I feel it's a shame you weren't blown up as a result. Weirdo.
 
Last edited:
Yeah people are always making a big deal out of old, poorly-maintained rolls. That's also where most of the "dead man voting" horseshit comes from. Could be an error too. Indiana pointing their finger at a black voter registration group who has been in conflict with them though. It seems really corrupt.

The most telling parts are Pence having his own tight race there, this story being brought up by a republican who has certain friends currently running while yelling "rigged!", and this end of the article:

If a registered voter does not check online in advance and shows up at the polls on Nov. 8, the person will be allowed to vote even if their record shows some incorrect information, Warycha said.

Julia Vaughn, the policy director for the nonpartisan government watchdog group Common Cause Indiana, said that before Lawson makes allegations of possible fraud her office "should make sure the voter file records haven't been altered through software snafus or human errors made by people in county or state agencies."

"There is almost no history of this kind of fraud here so her response helps to fuel irrational claims by Donald Trump and others that the election will be stolen through voter fraud," Vaughn said.
 
They have already proven violence is in their blood with the NC GOP office bombing.
A single bombing that hasn't been attributed to anyone or any particular group doesn't prove anything, let alone your argument. That's you trying to fit the evidence to your conclusion, which is offensive. You can still make your argument without manipulating the facts. Have some integrity and go do that, please.
 
No, you clearly haven't even read the article. And that's what this thread is about. So... why the fuck are you even here?



Oh, it's to stalk me. Yikes.



I feel it's a shame you weren't blown up as a result. Weirdo.
I saw your name in the thread and wanted to hear your thoughts on the recent scandals, apparently you have no thoughts on either....

"It's a shame I wasn't blown up too"? More dems wishing for violence?
 
Like the Bolsheviks and communists, and socialists before them, the far left will ultimately lose - but not before creating a lot of damage and destruction in the country they are infecting. The progressives are exactly why the 2nd amendment is there.
You seem to be a legitimate shit stain, too stupid to vote.
 
LOL.. It's like the official whiteflag wave for stupid people here.



You just keep forgetting "in a way that can't possibly affect votes" after the word 'altered'. Because you're desperately trying to spin this into something it's not.



Read the first few replies, and read what I first posted. The only jumping was you, to the defense of someone who had already drawn his slanted conclusion. Dumbass lol



Oh, so you are retarded. LOL! That wasn't what I was talking about at all there. I'd tell you what I did mean, but watching you struggle to get it... is funner.



....he said to the conservative, who's telling him a story about him being too fucking dumb to read an article and get it.

Classic this one single dumbass....
I defended somebody by asking you questions?

Still waiting to hear your thoughts on the DNC inciting violence at protests and rallies......or are you putting your head in the sand on that one?
 
I saw your name in the thread and wanted to hear your thoughts on the recent scandals, apparently you have no thoughts on either....

"It's a shame I wasn't blown up too"? More dems wishing for violence?

You'll find my thoughts in the threads I choose to share them in, or when they naturally arise in the course ofva discussion. Not when you're deflecting that hard.

And no, I'm not a democrat and was pretty much advocating you dying in the explosion. So more like, full on death.
 
Whether you're a Trump supporter or not, you have to be a complete moron to not see how it's rigged. Not only that but we have more evidence than ever showing how prevalent voter fraud is. Trump's reason for bringing it up is irrelevant to me and doesn't somehow make the obvious corruption not true. Just as an aside, the 2 most accurate polls from 2012 the L.A. Times poll and IDB poll, and now the Rasmussen poll actually have Trump ahead. Not going to get into it, though. Not really the point of this thread. ;)

Hillary Clinton in 2002: Bush was 'selected, not elected.'
http://archive.is/xztw2

Sanders: There Will Be A Contested Convention, System Is "Rigged"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._a_contested_convention_system_is_rigged.html

A look at Democrats in the past making claims of 'stolen' and rigged elections.



The LA poll has been constantly sighted as having a republican leaning bias when matched against the other 12 or so other legit polls out there. Or is silver just making this shit up?

And you are making a massive confusion over a very tightly contested race were the popular vote was lost and the desc. over a state that was not certified ultimately was decided on by the Supreme Court. Show me a race that is down to one state and a coupe of hanging chads or save the horrible comparisons with bush/gore.
 
I defended somebody by asking you questions?

It appeared that way until you admitted you were just here to learn about me. Now it appears creepy and desperate.

Still waiting to hear your thoughts on the DNC inciting violence at protests and rallies......or are you putting your head in the sand on that one?

We covered that, I was hoping you had been blown up in it. Violence is bad, unless it's for a good cause. Ripskater taught me that. So if you died in it, it's like nuking isis. Problem solved! I mean, Mission Accomplished!
 
You'll find my thoughts in the threads I choose to share them in, or when they naturally arise in the course ofva discussion. Not when you're deflecting that hard.

And no, I'm not a democrat and was pretty much advocating you dying in the explosion. So more like, full on death.
You're not a Democrat like Trump isn't a capitalist. Don't bullshit me.

Again you're saying I'm deflecting, deflecting...why don't you share your thoughts on the DNC inciting violence throughout the election? Because you can't spin it or justify it?
 
You're not a Democrat like Trump isn't a capitalist. Don't bullshit me.

I am not, nor have I ever been a registered democrat. So suck a fat bag of dead fucking wrong. Anymore.incorrect assumptions your points depend on I can shit on now, to save you some time and embarrassment?

Again you're saying I'm deflecting, deflecting...why don't you share your thoughts on the DNC inciting violence throughout the election? Because you can't spin it or justify it?

Because it's not the topic of this thread, the topic you're deflecting from.

Wow....
 
Dude no one cares about right or wrong here, we just wanna win.
 
It appeared that way until you admitted you were just here to learn about me. Now it appears creepy and desperate.



We covered that, I was hoping you had been blown up in it. Violence is bad, unless it's for a good cause. Ripskater taught me that. So if you died in it, it's like nuking isis. Problem solved! I mean, Mission Accomplished!
I was reading through the thread and saw your name, then decided to ask you a question because we've had a few exchanges...this is creepy how? Because somebody wants to know what you think? Are you that insecure on your position?

Are you suggesting that the bombing was for a good cause, so it's ok?
 
I am not, nor have I ever been a registered democrat. So suck a fat bag of dead fucking wrong. Anymore.incorrect assumptions your points depend on I can shit on now, to save you some time and embarrassment?



Because it's not the topic of this thread, the topic you're deflecting from.

Wow....
How was I deflecting when my initial comment was what started this exchange? I was deflecting from a conversation we weren't even having? Aren't I the talented conversationalist!
 
The most telling parts are Pence having his own tight race there, this story being brought up by a republican who has certain friends currently running while yelling "rigged!", and this end of the article:
Haha. Hopefully it's just using a clerical snafu to scare up business for Republicans and not the voter suppression they're notorious for...
 
I am not, nor have I ever been a registered democrat. So suck a fat bag of dead fucking wrong. Anymore.incorrect assumptions your points depend on I can shit on now, to save you some time and embarrassment?



Because it's not the topic of this thread, the topic you're deflecting from.

Wow....
Lmfao, you spend an awful lot of time defending Hillary for someone who's not democrat....

I feel like I've seen you hate on 3rd party candidates....what are you a secret trump supporter or something? Lol
 
Back
Top