Thanks I hadn't read further back than the post I originally quoted.
The rookie max contract point is interesting but I don't see the point in it. What is all that supposed to be fixing exactly?
As it stands right now, the worst team basically gets the #1 pick. That player signs for 4 years on a relatively low salary and then plays out those years until it's time for an extension for free agency. Your idea has the player making much less, with the option to sign with the team of their choice out of college, correct? So if Fultz signs with OKC, he's not going to get a lot of playing time and he probably wont get paid as much when his rookie contract is up. If Fultz signs with the 76ers, he has a much higher chance of getting a fat contract because he will get shots.....but that's already the system that's in place today. So where is the fix in all of that?
All I see is the option for Fultz to go to the Spurs. Parker retires in a year, Fultz balls out and now the Spurs stay exactly where they're at. If the NBA had a problem with rookies coming out, getting paid Albert Haynesworth style and then just half assing it, I could see the incentive to go your route. But as it stands, they're already doing exactly what you're talking about so the only point to it that I can see is them being able to choose which team they want to go to.
The only thing that's going to come out of that idea is the option for players to blacklist small market teams. It's not going to happen 100% of the time but it's going to happen enough to where those teams will never be able to dig themselves out of a hole unless the next sure fire HOF shows up and decides he's going to Phoenix to dominate.
Most good teams have holes somewhere so the rookies are generally going to flock to those teams. Harrison Barnes got a fat contract on very modest stats because Dallas was thinking that he was being held back by not getting enough touches. On the flip side, a good player can sign with a small market, put up 25/10/5 and only win 20 games a year. They could wind up with the same contract or less than like Barnes because they have the label as an empty stat player that doesn't produce wins. It's especially going to hurt when that player and their small market could draft guys like Shawn Marion who could propel them into the playoffs, except they can't because the Marion's of the world are going to already established teams.