UPDATED NYT: Obama Undermined The Trump Administration In Final Days

Yeah and now the NSA will have proof that all the conservatives in the War Room actually Google tranny porn
tbh the same could be said of libs. and moderates. what do you mean I'm projecting my sick habits onto other people?
 
This is the number one reason I lost all respect for Obama. Closely followed by his big fuck you to the Iraqis.
Obviously the world would have been better off if we stayed in Iraq... But people seem to forget that we kind of... got tired of being in Iraq? Damned if he did, damned if he didn't, but of course the actual consequences are much worse than poor public opinion. But it's all hindsight now, we would never have predicted that it would turn out like that. A low level insurgency? Sure, but Syria's border with Iraq collapsing and Sunni guerillas defeating the Iraqi military?
 
Obviously the world would have been better off if we stayed in Iraq... But people seem to forget that we kind of... got tired of being in Iraq? Damned if he did, damned if he didn't, but of course the actual consequences are much worse than poor public opinion. But it's all hindsight now, we would never have predicted that it would turn out like that. A low level insurgency? Sure, but Syria's border with Iraq collapsing and Sunni guerillas defeating the Iraqi military?

wasnt talking about the pullout. Even though in the context of what he did to their elections...that was a huge slap in the face. Is that what you think Obama's biggest fuck up in Iraq was? Mubarak bro. The frontline documentary on the entire ordeal lays a crash course on it out quite nicely. He put his own political capital above the lives of people. Just like Bush put his cronysm above the lives of american servicemen. Massive massive fuck up.
 
But but the source of the leaks is irrelevant! All that matters is the content! Hypocrites.
 
wasnt talking about the pullout. Even though in the context of what he did to their elections...that was a huge slap in the face. Is that what you think Obama's biggest fuck up in Iraq was? Mubarak bro. The frontline documentary on the entire ordeal lays a crash course on it out quite nicely. He put his own political capital above the lives of people. Just like Bush put his cronysm above the lives of american servicemen. Massive massive fuck up.

You mean Maliki?
 
wasnt talking about the pullout. Even though in the context of what he did to their elections...that was a huge slap in the face. Is that what you think Obama's biggest fuck up in Iraq was? Mubarak bro. The frontline documentary on the entire ordeal lays a crash course on it out quite nicely. He put his own political capital above the lives of people. Just like Bush put his cronysm above the lives of american servicemen. Massive massive fuck up.


Is this documentary on YT? I wanted to see it.
 
So...one last attempt to protect this country?

GOAT President you say.

nasa%201.jpg

fbf.gif
 
Leftists already defending shadow governments because they hate Trump. Some sheep like to be led.

It's more like the agencies that deal with sensitive intel know from first hand experience that Trump is a walking, talking, tweeting declassification.

korea14n-2-web.jpg


Here he is being a moron. Oh let's conduct a meeting on North Korea's missile launch in full view of the public and press. "Hey guys, make sure to take pictures of me doing some dumb shit."
 
It wasn't long ago a poster called me a conspiracy theorist for saying the NSA would eventually spy on and manipulate politicians with incriminating information. We already went down this road with J Edgar Hoover. Among a million other examples.

Obama is such a piece of shit. A literal demon.

And trumps new NSA guy agrees.

I guess you can't have a Stasi on just the NSA's budget, you need all of their budgets together. DHS, CIA, FBI, ect.....
 
Obama routinely fapped to the thought of drone strikes and NSAs cloud
 
further empowered a shadow government, as if they aren't already all-powerful and rogue enough, thanks Obama. fucking asshole.

But Patrick Toomey, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, called the move an erosion of rules intended to protect the privacy of Americans when their messages are caught by the N.S.A.’s powerful global collection methods. He noted that domestic internet data was often routed or stored abroad, where it may get vacuumed up without court oversight.

“Rather than dramatically expanding government access to so much personal data, we need much stronger rules to protect the privacy of Americans,” Mr. Toomey said. “Seventeen different government agencies shouldn’t be rooting through Americans’ emails with family members, friends and colleagues, all without ever obtaining a warrant.”
 
I just want the person who tipped off Yemen publicly executed for treason. Let the rest learn from that... Ron Paul is right about there being zero need for the cia and nsa anymore.
 
So people put in charge of Intel and information are reporting how crooked our new president is.


The leaks were okay when they were titled towards Clinton but not towards trump. Stay classy conservative morons.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...to-share-intercepted-communications.html?_r=0

Seeing as how the deep state, which includes the NSA and FBI, appear to be leaking all of Trump’s private phone calls with foreign leaders and took down General Michael Flynn by spying on his calls and leaking them to their friends in The Washington Post and The New York Times, the story is being looked at in a completely new light.

As the The New York Times reported on January 12th:

In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.

The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.

The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.

Previously, the N.S.A. filtered information before sharing intercepted communications with another agency, like the C.I.A. or the intelligence branches of the F.B.I. and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.

Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.

“This is not expanding the substantive ability of law enforcement to get access to signals intelligence,” said Robert S. Litt, the general counsel to Mr. Clapper. “It is simply widening the aperture for a larger number of analysts, who will be bound by the existing rules.”

But Patrick Toomey, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, called the move an erosion of rules intended to protect the privacy of Americans when their messages are caught by the N.S.A.’s powerful global collection methods. He noted that domestic internet data was often routed or stored abroad, where it may get vacuumed up without court oversight.

“Rather than dramatically expanding government access to so much personal data, we need much stronger rules to protect the privacy of Americans,” Mr. Toomey said. “Seventeen different government agencies shouldn’t be rooting through Americans’ emails with family members, friends and colleagues, all without ever obtaining a warrant.”




This rule has been around since the Reagan administration and Obama didn't change it until days before he left office. Is this what happened to Flynn?I s this why Trump’s calls with foreign leaders are being illegally leaked to the press in order to sabotage his presidency?
If trump won't do any crooked shit, it won't get leaked lol
 
So people put in charge of Intel and information are reporting how crooked our new president is.


The leaks were okay when they were titled towards Clinton but not towards trump. Stay classy conservative morons.


Says the liberal moron who thinks John Podesta's e-mails are the same as intelligence agencies leaking information to biased media. Same liberals who now suddenly love the NSA because they are hurting Trump.
 
Former CIA Analyst Says Barack Obama Is Behind the White House Leaks

http://www.independentsentinel.com/...barack-obama-is-behind-the-white-house-leaks/


See people, this is an example of a misleading headline, not the headline where CNN says Trump disrespected a Jewish reporter. Because if you read that article, you would see Trump actually disrespecting the Jewish Reporter. If you read this article, you will not see anyone say Obama is behind the White House Leaks.
 
Back
Top