Now that milo yiannopoulos looks to be gone, was he good for the lgbt cause?

It doesn't seem like being a white gay man was enough to allow him to speak his mind, in the end. He did always speculate that white homosexuals would likely be dropped off the socialist list of concern, in the coming years, and be regarded as part of the oppressor class. I guess he proved it.

Well if you buy into class warfare angle it would make sense since gay white men tend to be part of the upperclass in terms of income and wealth.
 
Considering he is an admitted self loathing homosexual, who is on the record saying he wishes he wasn't gay, I'm gonna say "no". Probably not the best advocate.
 
A gay guy does not represent LGBT people simply because he's gay. And Milo did not support pedophilia.
 
Well if you buy into class warfare angle it would make sense since gay white men tend to be part of the upperclass in terms of income and wealth.

Indeed, but it appears that the far-leftists are only starting to figure it out.

Eventually, we will see white homosexuals ousted from the LGBT community, unless they act sub-servient to the others.
 
I don't think he is good or bad for any cause. I consider him a distraction from actual discussion.
 
Indeed, but it appears that the far-leftists are only starting to figure it out.

Eventually, we will see white homosexuals ousted from the LGBT community, unless they act sub-servient to the others.

That wouldn't happen anytime soon. The Dems like the Reps have a lot of groups under one tent and there has always been in fighting which is normal.

I think W did a pretty good job of trying to court the Gay community but since then the Reps have done everything they can to ostracize them. As long as the Rendell/Clinton wing keeps them from going full Sanders on the economy and Reps keep fighting tooth and nail on gay marriage you won't see any movement.
 
he made right wingers more lax on homos. thats for sure.
 
Back
Top