the paper doesn't tell you that it was designed by a creator or an intelligent designer, that's for sure. reading the article, it doesn't go into the "common ancestor" evolution, only the part they were researching. can't insert something that's not there. everything in that article is explicitly stated. scientific papers can't be vague. again I asked you, where did you get that they hinted at a designer? you didn't answer my original question properly. I want quotes and references.