- Joined
- May 29, 2013
- Messages
- 21,005
- Reaction score
- 2
https://nypost.com/2017/09/09/saudi-government-allegedly-funded-a-dry-run-for-911/
new information indicating Saudi government may have funded a test run of 9/11 attacks
Interesting reading for sure.
I would like people to contrast this information with the information put forth by the "9/11 was an inside job" investigtors. The unanswered questions here don't have anything to do with what is literally possible in our reality. Instead, we have a string of strange instances which, in hindsight, make perfect sense. There are many people along the way who documented events and left paper trails which we're finding and piecing together; the people who were involved in the incident are being exposed. There are no tenuous connections being drawn, there are no wild theories that more resemble fiction than past events, and there is no need to make radical leaps in logic.
Maybe I'm a sheep.
new information indicating Saudi government may have funded a test run of 9/11 attacks
Fresh evidence submitted in a major 9/11 lawsuit moving forward against the Saudi Arabian government reveals its embassy in Washington may have funded a “dry run” for the hijackings carried out by two Saudi employees, further reinforcing the claim that employees and agents of the kingdom directed and aided the 9/11 hijackers and plotters.
Two years before the airliner attacks, the Saudi Embassy paid for two Saudi nationals, living undercover in the US as students, to fly from Phoenix to Washington “in a dry run for the 9/11 attacks,” alleges the amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of some 1,400 victims who died in the terrorist attacks 16 years ago.
...
During a November 1999 America West flight to Washington, Qudhaeein and Shalawi are reported to have tried multiple times to gain access to the cockpit of the plane in an attempt to test flight-deck security in advance of the hijackings.
“After they boarded the plane in Phoenix, they began asking the flight attendants technical questions about the flight that the flight attendants found suspicious,” according to a summary of the FBI case files.
“When the plane was in flight, al-Qudhaeein asked where the bathroom was; one of the flight attendants pointed him to the back of the plane,” it added. “Nevertheless, al-Qudhaeein went to the front of the plane and attempted on two occasions to enter the cockpit.”
The pilots were so spooked by the Saudi passengers and their aggressive behavior that they made an emergency landing in Ohio. On the ground there, police handcuffed them and took them into custody. Though the FBI later questioned them, it decided not to pursue prosecution.
Interesting reading for sure.
I would like people to contrast this information with the information put forth by the "9/11 was an inside job" investigtors. The unanswered questions here don't have anything to do with what is literally possible in our reality. Instead, we have a string of strange instances which, in hindsight, make perfect sense. There are many people along the way who documented events and left paper trails which we're finding and piecing together; the people who were involved in the incident are being exposed. There are no tenuous connections being drawn, there are no wild theories that more resemble fiction than past events, and there is no need to make radical leaps in logic.
Maybe I'm a sheep.