International USMCA: Congress Ratified New & Improved Trade Deal To Replace NAFTA


Fair deal for all? Why and when the fuck did Trump care about NAFTA being fair for anyone but USA? I wasn't completely opposed to his presidency because he was all about "America First". Now he gives a shit about the Canadian and Mexican blood suckers?

He's pulling one hell of an about-face. On par with Obama and his pulling troops out of Iraq rhetoric.
 
He's not even a paper tiger, he's like a paper obese cat covered in circus peanuts.
 
Don't think for a second that the folks helped by renegotiating NAFTA are going to forget who helped them when they hit the voting booth in 2020.


Carry on with your click bait headline discussion about Trump keeping his campaign promise to renegotiate NAFTA.
 
Threatening to walk away from a deal to get better terms is pretty standard no? It isn't really backing down when you don't walk away, it's backing down if you don't get better terms and don't walk away
 
Threatening to walk away from a deal to get better terms is pretty standard no? It isn't really backing down when you don't walk away, it's backing down if you don't get better terms and don't walk away

When you already overwhelmingly benefit from the deal, you don't threaten to scrap the entire thing.

Tweak it, sure. But threatening to blow it up is full retard.
 
When you already overwhelmingly benefit from the deal, you don't threaten to scrap the entire thing.

Tweak it, sure. But threatening to blow it up is full retard.

If you're a faux-populist touting protectionist policies you do, and maybe even follow thru with it for short-term popularity boost before the chickens come home to roost. The economic sense of such maneuvers are a separate issue though
 
Canada, Mexico identify states that could lose big if NAFTA unravels
By Dave Graham and David LjunggrenReuters

14330683.jpg

From launching a data-mining drive aiming to find supply-chain pressure points to sending officials to mobilize allies in key U.S. states, Mexico and Canada are bolstering their defenses of a regional trade pact President Donald Trump vows to rewrite.

Trump has blamed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) for the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs and has threatened to tear it up if he fails to get a better deal.

Fearing the massive disruptions a U.S. pullout could cause, the United States’ neighbors and two biggest export markets have focused on sectors most exposed to a breakdown in free trade and with the political clout to influence Washington.

That encompasses many of the states that swept Trump to power in November and senior politicians such as Vice President Mike Pence, a former Indiana governor or Wisconsin representative and House Speaker Paul Ryan. Prominent CEOs on Trump’s business councils are also key targets, according to people familiar with the lobbying push.

Mexico, for example, has picked out the governors of Texas, Arizona and Indiana as potential allies.

Decision makers in Michigan, North Carolina, Minnesota, Illinois, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, California and New Mexico are also on Mexico’s priority list, according to people involved in talks.

Mexican and U.S. officials and executives have had “hundreds” of meetings since Trump took office, said Moises Kalach, foreign trade chief of the Mexican private sector team leading the defense of NAFTA.

Canada has drawn up a list of 11 U.S. states, largely overlapping with Mexico’s targets, that stand to lose the most if the trade pact enacted in 1994 unravels.

To identify potential allies among U.S. companies and industries, Mexican business lobby Consejo Coordinador Empresarial (CCE) recruited IQOM, a consultancy led by former NAFTA negotiators Herminio Blanco and Jaime Zabludovsky.

In one case, the analysis found that in Indiana, one type of engine made up about a fifth of the state’s $5 billion exports to Mexico. Kalach’s team identified one local supplier of the product and put it touch with its main Mexican client.

“We said: talk to the governor, talk to the members of congress, talk to your ex-governor, Vice President Pence, and explain that if this goes wrong, the company is done,” Kalach said. He declined to reveal the name of the company and Reuters could not immediately verify its identity.

Prime target

Mexico has been the prime target of NAFTA critics, who blame it for lost manufacturing jobs and widening U.S. trade deficits. Canada had managed to keep a lower profile, concentrating on seeking U.S. allies in case of an open conflict.

That changed in late April when the Trump administration attacked Ottawa over support for dairy farmers and slapped preliminary duties on softwood lumber imports.

Despite an apparently weaker position – Canada and Mexico jointly absorb about a third of U.S. exports, but rely on U.S. demand for three quarters of their own – the two have managed to even up the odds in the past by exploiting certain weak spots.

When Washington clashed with Ottawa in 2013 over meat-labeling rules, Canada retaliated by targeting exports from the states of key U.S. legislators. A similar policy is again under consideration.

Mexico is taking a leaf out of a 2011 trucking dispute to identify U.S. interests that are most exposed, such as $2.3 billion of yellow corn exports.

Mexico is also targeting members of Trump advisory bodies, the Strategic and Policy Forum and the Manufacturing Council, led by Blackstone Group LP’s Stephen Schwarzman and Dow Chemical Co boss Andrew Liveris respectively.

cpt115402451_high5.jpg


Senior Trump administration officials and Republican lawmakers in charge of trade, agriculture and finance committees also feature among top lobbying targets.

Canada has spread the task of lobbying the United States among ministries, official say, and is particularly keen to avoid disruption to the highly-integrated auto industry.

A core component of Mexico’s strategy is to argue the three nations have a common interest in fending off Asian competition and exploring scope to source more content regionally.

The defenders of NAFTA also say that it supports millions of jobs in the United States, and point out that U.S. trade shortfalls with Canada and Mexico have declined over the past decade even as the deficit with China continued to climb.

Part of IQOM’s mission is to identify sectors where NAFTA rules of origin could be modified to increase regional content.

For example, U.S., Canadian and Mexican officials are debating how the NAFTA region can reduce auto parts imports from China, Japan, South Korea or Germany, Mexican officials say.

“The key thing is to see how we can get a win-win on the products most used in our countries, and to develop common manufacturing platforms that allow us just to buy between ourselves the biggest amount of inputs we need,” said Luis Aguirre, vice-president of Mexican industry group Concamin.

http://globalnews.ca/news/3425785/canada-mexico-nafta/
 
Last edited:
How a call to Canada from Jared Kushner started a NAFTA scramble
Alexander Panetta, The Canadian Press | May 08, 2017

web-nw-wo-us-kushner.JPG

A phone call from U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law set off a frantic scramble ending in sighs of relief across three national capitals that the North American Free Trade Agreement would survive.

Jared Kushner called around supper time.

It happened on an intrigue-filled day last month after different news reports said Trump was seriously thinking of invoking Article 2205 of NAFTA, which would be the first step in cancelling the quarter-century-old deal.

There are contrasting accounts of what really happened April 26.

One version suggests Trump was simply bluffing about blowing up NAFTA. Another describes it as a White House power-struggle that played out in public. For his part, Trump insists he really came close to withdrawing from the deal.

What dissuaded him, Trump says, were evening phone calls from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and President Enrique Pena Nieto.

”Two people that I like very much, the president of Mexico, prime minister of Canada, they called up, they said, can we negotiate? I said, yes, we can renegotiate,” Trump told a rally in Pennsylvania several days later.

”So we’ll start a renegotiation.”

He didn’t delve into the details. But here’s what happened.

Washington was abuzz over those reports hinting at the possible demise of NAFTA. Some Trump administration members urged him not to proceed, warning of the economic bedlam such a move would cause. At the Canadian embassy in Washington, some were heartened by the intensity of the reaction.

The business community and lawmakers had, for the most part, quietly abided Trump’s trade-skeptical campaign talk for over a year but were suddenly springing to action, flooding contacts with phone calls and pleas not to touch NAFTA.

Then came the call from Kushner.

A pair of sources described the chain of events. At about 6 p.m., the senior White House aide contacted a counterpart in Ottawa. The president’s son-in-law and adviser called PMO chief of staff Katie Telford, and said: Trump has a free moment, right now, to speak about NAFTA.

He suggested Trudeau might want to call the White House.

Telford veered to a stop. She happened to be in a carpool, commuting with her colleague Gerald Butts. The senior officials pulled over to the side of the road in Tunney’s Pasture, an industrial-park-like federal area in west-end Ottawa.

They got in touch with Trudeau, and the prime minister contacted Trump. The prime minister stressed the economic disruption that would be caused in people’s lives, should the deal be suddenly jettisoned. Trump also spoke to Pena Nieto and, a few hours later, the White House issued a statement: NAFTA was saved, for now, and would be renegotiated — not terminated.

The White House says the game of telephone actually began earlier in the day, on the Canadian side. An official there told the Associated Press on Monday that the initial call was placed by Trudeau aides, who were concerned about the media reports.

Kushner said the leaders should speak, said he would set up a time, and called back to confirm it, according to that account.

It’s still a little murky, what Trump really intended that day.

”I’m not sure. I think they were genuinely close to pulling out,” one Canadian said.

”(But) I think the story is a little messier than that.”

The different parties involved, in both countries, might be spinning the details to their benefit, he said. That’s the opinion of some NAFTA experts — who believe the whole thing was theatre, orchestrated by the White House.

”A negotiating ploy,” said Gary Hufbauer of the Peterson Institute in Washington. ”True to Trump’s style.”

One Mexican official said an American colleague even admitted as much.

Foreign minister Luis Videgaray told media that an American colleague told him who the intended target was — the U.S. Congress. Congress has been dragging its heels in starting the NAFTA negotiation process and, according to the Mexican minister, some described the sudden activity as a pressure-tactic intended to light a fire under Capitol Hill.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...r-started-a-scramble-on-nafta/article34928505
 
Last edited:
I'd be ok with Anglo free trade sphere. Kick out Mexico or make them an associate with restrictions.
 
Trump needs to play hardball not keep back tracking on all of his campaign promises.
 
Senate confirms President Trump's trade representative ahead of NAFTA talks
By Jason Lange and Lindsay Dunsmuir | Thu May 11, 2017​



The U.S. Senate on Thursday approved President Donald Trump's nominee for U.S. Trade Representative, a critical position ahead of renegotiations of the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico.

Delays in Senate confirmation of veteran trade lawyer Robert Lighthizer more than 100 days after his nomination have set back Trump's trade agenda, including the start of talks about revamping one of the world's biggest trading blocs.

But Lighthizer won support from both Republicans and Democrats in the Senate on Thursday, with a 82-14 vote to confirm his nomination.

The administration has had to wait for Lighthizer to be in place before triggering the formal process to begin renegotiating NAFTA. It was not immediately clear when the White House would begin that process.

Trump has said the 23-year-old trade pact devastated U.S. workers and has vowed to tear it up if he fails to get a better deal.

Some Democrats, while critical of Trump's own views on trade, said they were confident Lighthizer, who served in the Reagan administration as deputy U.S. Trade Representative, would work to help U.S. workers.

"He's a real pro," Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, said before voting in favor of Lighthizer's nomination.

Lighthizer's approval came despite the objections of two Republican senators, John McCain of Arizona and Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who said they were worried Lighthizer did not appreciate NAFTA's benefits.

While the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico has ballooned since the trade deal was enacted in 1994, U.S. farmers have profited from exports to America's southern neighbor while automakers have cut costs by building cross-border supply chains that benefit from lower Mexican wages.

Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican who chairs the Senate Finance Committee and voted in favor of Lighthizer's nomination, also urged the incoming trade representative to be careful not to put at risk the gains NAFTA has brought.

"There are definitely opportunities to update and improve NAFTA," Hatch said. "But it is important that the administration follow the spirit of the Hippocratic oath: First do no harm."

Lighthizer for the past nearly 30 years has been a trade lawyer representing American steel companies in their efforts to fight dumping of foreign-made steel below costs and unfair steel subsidies from foreign governments. He has pledged to strengthen enforcement of existing trade deals and to find new legal tools to combat unfair trade practices.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-lighthizer-idUSKBN18727C
 
Last edited:
Wait, wait, where is it. Where'd I put it? Oh, there it is...

tumblr_nmsf43ikYV1tq4of6o1_500.gif


My favorite record. I love it even more now that it's broken. Repeat forev....for four years.
 
There's only one way NAFTA can work for the 21st century
Victoria A. Espinel

104279725-GettyImages-635116784.530x298.jpg

President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau walk down the West Wing Colonnade

  • The Trump administration pulled the trigger on NAFTA renegotiations.
  • The digital economy should take center stage in NAFTA discussions.
  • Trade deals need provisions to protect the free flow of data across borders.

President Trump, who threatened to kill NAFTA on the campaign trail, instead recently pulled the trigger on renegotiating the trade pact. That could have massive ramifications for how the U.S. and its neighbors Canada and Mexico conduct business in the future. The move presents a golden opportunity to create the first truly modern trade agenda.

Here's what should take center stage when negotiations begin this summer: The digital economy.

A new NAFTA can set a global precedent that takes into account how much our world has changed in the last 25 years and the outsize role data now plays in business and cross-border trade.

When the North American Free Trade Agreement was concluded in 1994, floppy disks reigned supreme and the Internet was in its infancy. Today, the digital economy (driven by data, software, artificial intelligence, and analytics) spurs growth and jobs in every sector, especially in manufacturing, banking, hospitality, healthcare and education.

Despite this enormous economic impact and increasing global competition, there is no trade agreement in place that has clear, strong, and enforceable rules on data. The decision to modernize NAFTA is the perfect opportunity to create rules that ensure the digital economy can thrive and grow across North America – rules that can be used in all trade agreements to come.

So what would these rules look like?

Trade agreements need provisions that protect the free flow of data. The software we rely on depends on the rapid and seamless movement of data across borders. Making cross-border trade easier for services like cloud computing and data analytics would have broad economic benefits in every country.

Data has transformed commerce for businesses of all sizes, from small entrepreneurial companies to large American manufacturers. When data can move freely, start-ups and small companies across the continent – essential for job growth – can access powerful data processing and analytical tools without having to invest in expensive in-house computer infrastructure.

Another welcome rule would stop data localization requirements. Some countries around the world are either considering or already have put into place laws and policies that restrict data flows and instead lock data within their individual borders.

One practical way this manifests itself is by requiring companies to build data centers within a country's borders if they want to operate in that country. Those barriers are too often rationalized on privacy or security grounds. NAFTA and other modern trade agreements should require close scrutiny of these rationales to ensure that they are narrowly drawn and not veiled ways to block companies from serving global markets.

No digital trade framework would be complete without protections for the development of emerging technologies, which allow companies to expand and create new jobs. Technology is changing the way we do business every day, from electronic authentications, to artificial intelligence, to "smart" contracts.

New software should be able to break into global markets without facing an uphill regulatory battle. Companies shouldn't have to give up their proprietary source codes to foreign governments in order to do business—and right now, there is no enforceable rule in place that prevents this from happening. NAFTA can pave the way.

It's time for NAFTA to meet the digital age.

Commentary by Victoria A. Espinel, president and CEO of BSA | The Software Alliance. Previously, she was an adviser to President Barack Obama on intellectual property and a chief trade negotiator under President George W. Bush.

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/25/nafta-trade-deal-a-digital-makeover-commentary.html
 
Last edited:
Fair deal for all? Why and when the fuck did Trump care about NAFTA being fair for anyone but USA? I wasn't completely opposed to his presidency because he was all about "America First". Now he gives a shit about the Canadian and Mexican blood suckers?

He's pulling one hell of an about-face. On par with Obama and his pulling troops out of Iraq rhetoric.
I can't even tell which posts are serious in this forum anymore.
 
Things were looking so dire half a year ago, now they look promising.

Specially now that most people realized that Trump´s words are meaningless.
 
Back
Top