- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,511
- Reaction score
- 21,592
Although, as the liberal side agreed, that argument was pretty comically farcical to me. All of them, iirc, agreed that the school could exercise discretion in maintaining order (the liberals said that an actual showing of interference with the educational process or retention of administrative order was, however, required - while the conservatives more or less said that minors don't get rigid free speech rights), but only the conservatives actually made the argument that prohibiting endorsement of drug use (by millennia-dead religious figures?) was the school's primary interest.
When it comes to rationalizing rights (or lack thereof) for minors, its a fuckin' shitshow. No dog in the fight at this point. Seems like the promotion of crime is the clear winner. Protecting religion from ridicule should always be a sure loser. What's more deserving of challenge than "God told me so."?