- Joined
- May 14, 2004
- Messages
- 9,360
- Reaction score
- 5,305
I never gave a definition.You seem to have a very narrow definition of art.
I never gave a definition.You seem to have a very narrow definition of art.
I never gave a definition.
If it's visual art than it absolutely should be. Try not to confuse a definition of art in its entirety with setting some much needed objective standards.I got the impression you feel art should be aesthetically pleasing.
If someone took a portrait of Jesus on the cross and painted a naked dude on top of it, you don't think moderate Christians might say something?
I'm not following you. Does Dunham's father have a female butthole fetish?
On one end I think Islam needs to be ridiculed out of existence...on the other, shitty art needs the same happen to it.
Not sure how I feel.
Not true actually. Meaning is subjective but aesthetics/beauty is about symmetry (among other things). In my opinion , it's the fact that there are no standards and also people like you who have way too broad a view of what art can be that has led to this mess we call modern art.I define art much more widely. I do not think that the artist needs to even try to make something aesthetically pleasing for it to be art. The problem with objective standards on aesthetics is that they are impossible to agree on.
anyone who portrayed mohamed as a dog deserve a bullet in his head like that french artist. Play silly games and all
Yes they do.There was a piece called Piss Christ or something like that. Yes, Christians were offended. No, we didnt call for it to be sensored.
Not true actually. Meaning is subjective but aesthetics/beauty is about symmetry (among other things). In my opinion , it's the fact that there are no standards and also people like you who have way too broad a view of what art can be that has led to this mess we call modern art.
Take the OP for instance. The prayer mat seems beautiful enough but the ideology that it stems from is disgusting. The actual "art" is supposedly what's painted over it which is a naked woman's body. Now there is a new meaning to it which is significant to a degree but the aesthetics are gross. Just because there is a message that may be profound it does not make it art nor beautiful. Powerful maybe but as visual art it's absolute trash.
Such a shame, this one was in Canada before Cuck Trudeau got in:Comedians get sued for jokes up here.
anyone who portrayed mohamed as a dog deserve a bullet in his head like that french artist. Play silly games and all
We are going to disagree here. For instance, the very beautiful and valuable antique tea pot I was gifted when I got married in Japan is valuable for, among other things, the fact that a slight defect has made is asymmetrical. In painting one need only look at works like Van Gogh's Starry Night to see that symmetry is not necessary for many art experts to determine that art is high quality.
Conceptual art that artistic snobs hold as the highest standard and if you don't understand their garbage you are the misinformed Individual. There is art today that is stunning but they are not in the spot light like the other idiots are. Oh you puked on a canvas and now we are supposed to extrapolate some profound underlying meaning to it and if we don't we simply haven't expanded our minds enough.......yea no thanks.Also, what do you mean "mess" of modern art.
No one is stopping them from consuming anything but do not pretend that their isn't objectively bad food and objectively good food. By your logic absolutely anything no matter how grotesque can be considered art, I refuse to believe that.I think we can agree that they are both food and let folks like whichever on they want
Yes they do.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...no-piss-christ-destroyed-christian-protesters
https://www.thelocal.it/20151113/piss-christ-creates-fury-at-italian-art-show
Don't really blame them. The "artist" feigned ignorance too "I didn't know this would be a big deal"
http://nationalpost.com/opinion/chr...er-mat-too-provocative-for-ontario-art-school
What a bunch of cowards.