- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Messages
- 8,494
- Reaction score
- 1
And has said he will be investigating potential obstruction of justice by Trump. Meaning he will likely personally interview Comey.
Comey had a legal obligation to immediately disclose any attempts at obstructing the investigation.
Or Comey did not believe Trump's conduct had jumped to the point of obstruction until Comey was firedComey had a legal obligation to immediately disclose any attempts at obstructing the investigation.
The Comey/Trump dinner alone probably doesn't constitute obstruction of justice but when you compound that with Comey being fired in trumps words to ease the Russian investigation and then also his bragging to the Russian officials Of the firing all of the evidence together may point to obstruction of justice
Or Comey did not believe Trump's conduct had jumped to the point of obstruction until Comey was fired
He probably will pardon him at the end of this. Doesn't change anything.Trump could pardon Flynn. Then what liberals?
I can definitely imagine that Trump told Comey to shut down the Flynn investigation.
What I don't get (didn't really follow the story), the "memo" they're talking about all the time would simply be a note written down by then-director Comey?
I don't see why this seems to be treated as the corpus deliciti, at least in media reports. Isn't it still simply Trump's word vs Comey's?
What exactly does him writing something down change? Obviously, anybody can write down anything at any time?
@Quipling answer plz
I can definitely imagine that Trump told Comey to shut down the Flynn investigation.
What I don't get (didn't really follow the story), the "memo" they're talking about all the time would simply be a note written down by then-director Comey?
I don't see why this seems to be treated as the corpus deliciti, at least in media reports. Isn't it still simply Trump's word vs Comey's?
What exactly does him writing something down change? Obviously, anybody can write down anything at any time?
@Quipling answer plz
Trump could pardon Flynn. Then what liberals?
Probably a little more formal than a note, but if you're asking if it has some official inherent significance, not that I can think of. I write memos all the time. We use them for things (including as a record that we considered issues that wound up not being publicly discussed), but they mostly just have value as a record.I can definitely imagine that Trump told Comey to shut down the Flynn investigation.
What I don't get (didn't really follow the story), the "memo" they're talking about all the time would simply be a note written down by then-director Comey?
Not sure what you mean by corpus deliciti here. Perhaps its a usage with which I'm unfamiliar - you appear to be using it as a sort of knock-out-blow usage.I don't see why this seems to be treated as the corpus deliciti, at least in media reports. Isn't it still simply Trump's word vs Comey's?
Yes, anyone can write anything down at any time. And at the moment, this is basically a credibility contest. He said-she said contests generally do boil down to credibility contests, but credibility contests are resolvable, if not definitively.What exactly does him writing something down change? Obviously, anybody can write down anything at any time?
@Quipling answer plz
ok thxProbably a little more formal than a note, but if you're asking if it has some official inherent significance, not that I can think of. I write memos all the time. We use them for things (including as a record that we considered issues that wound up not being publicly discussed), but they mostly just have value as a record.
Not sure what you mean by corpus deliciti here. Perhaps its a usage with which I'm unfamiliar - you appear to be using it as a sort of knock-out-blow usage.
Yes, anyone can write anything down at any time. And at the moment, this is basically a credibility contest. He said-she said contests generally do boil down to credibility contests, but credibility contests are resolvable, if not definitively.
However, the fact that there's a paper record of him having written the memos well before being terminated (and within a day or two of the conversations) is something that weighs in his favor in terms of credibility, which is (at least part of the reason) he did it. In a normal court proceeding, he'd probably read the memo into the record as part of his testimony on what Trump said to him.
At the end of the day, it's basically just his testimony+++. Strong, but not an automatic victory.
Comey has delayed testifying in front of Congress as agreed to before because he wants to confer with Mueller first to make sure he doesn't talk about anything that would impede his special investigation now.
I'm betting Comey will not testify at all now.
IIRC Comey's personal memo's were used as evidence before because they were corroborated by Mueller's memory of the same incidents. So likely Mueller will put a lot of weight into the memo's. Also Comey showed the memo's to trusted FBI agents and DOJ officials at the time he made them, so it couldn't be claimed he made them up now after the fact.
Also Trump has lied about anything and everything - lies and doesn't give a shit. So you take Comey's word over his 100x out of 100.
All is not rosy with Dems on this though, as Special Committee would release all findings after they completed their investigation, but Special Council will just release charges, if any.
The Comey/Trump dinner alone probably doesn't constitute obstruction of justice but when you compound that with Comey being fired in trumps words to ease the Russian investigation and then also his bragging to the Russian officials Of the firing all of the evidence together may point to obstruction of justice