Discussion in 'The War Room' started by waiguoren, Sep 13, 2017.
Paid vs recruit has no relevance to my own reply
It's hard to tell with such a nonsensical comment
I think we should promote fracking until the entires rust belt becomes a sink hole and the miserable inhabitants are either swallowed by the earth or forced to take their lives somewhere that doesn't absolutely suck.
Stephen King writes about this in 1964-- you almost definitely could have swung the entire 2000 national election with 25k in cash on the ground on Election Day in Florida.
Imagine the diffrerent world we'd live in if Al Gore was the president in 2000.
They claim voter suppression wasn't a topic leading up to the election? Dafuq? They talk about voter suppression all the time. Hilldawg was just a horrendous candidate and didn't earn those people's votes.
Do you know about Katy Tur's dad?
Exactly. Motherfuckers are saying my thread title was misleading because I wrote "pay" instead of "recruit". It wasn't even intentional, I just translated "recruit" to "pay" in my head because HOW ELSE ARE YOU GOING TO GET FAMILIES TO DO THIS
does anyone else see the irony of them talking about voter suppression but wanting to move people from one state to another to suppress the vote of the citizens in the second state?
Lucky that tranny picked on a dweep like Shapiro. Otherwise that sheman would be catching teh jab.
I think there is a difference between registering new voters and preventing someone from voting.
That said, I am skeptical of claims such as that 200,000 black votes were suppressed in Wisconsin. Haven't seen any good evidence and it just seems like whining to me.
How about they move to Iran?
Doesn't seem like a very solid plan. I know like 10 couples who broke up over the last election, and I think around 0 broke up over being a Calvin Coolidge supporter. Something is broken here.
10? That's a lot.
Wonder how many of our democrat brothers throw this a like. Pretty funny!
Separate names with a comma.