Mr.Putin points out US's and War Room's ridiculous hypocrisy

None of them care. They just hate Trump.
it seems like a hobby.
most don't even have a clue about ww foreign politics. because they are not affected directly. it's easy to talk shit out of the basement.
it is truly sad that they support pro war agendas.
 
Good gracious you are Fn stupid.

Even trump was quoted “the Russians tampered with the election.”

The fact you say you love America is fucking insane

You keep doing it, saying even trump admitted it.
There is Clear evidence hear and there.
FBI said so

So tell me in what physical ways Russia could alter or did alter the election...specifically, you peasant.
 
The answers to your questions have been provided already. Please don't derail the discussion by pretending that you don't know the events that have led to this point. Thank you.

Why Is everyone deflecting? You can't answer the question.
In what ways did Russia alter the election?
They hacked what? And that hacking altered the election how?

They used fake Facebook ads?

Memes?

You guys are so weird

I know the events
Hilary lost and liberals had no excuse.

Now this is the best part

Trump during the election was the only one to bring up Russia meddling and he was met with laughter and ridicule



Then after the election the same topic they made fun of trump on, they run with.

Freaking liberals man

Comey said he was opening a criminal investigation in Clinton close to the election. That was a major kick in Clintons nuts.

What could have Russia done to hurt Clinton's chances that were more damaging then what Comey did.
 
Last edited:
You keep doing it, saying even trump admitted it.
There is Clear evidence hear and there.
FBI said so

So tell me in what physical ways Russia could alter or did alter the election...specifically, you peasant.

Oh you know what Russia did, they released damaging emails showing the Democrats and Clintons acting in a criminal way.

How dare they share those emails. The criminal activity of Clinton was never supposed to be seen. The nerve of them.
That combined with facebooks ads. I mean that some solid stuff
 
Last edited:
So then why do we worry about terrorist attacks? I mean we've bombed the shit out of places, so it's only fair if people do the same to us. Right?

That's the continuation of this non-thought process.
Shut up and love Putin
 
Soooo...... we blow up building in other countries. That makes 9/11 totally fine and should happen many more times? Weve nuked cities before. Should the USA just accept having nuclear weapons used on a couple cities?

Fuck you guys are stupid.
Moral equivalency, it's what's for dinner
 
Russia shit posted on Facebook and hacked the DNC. Did they do anything else?

While it would have been cool if the RNC was hacked as well, at least we found out the Democratic Party destroyed all semblance of democracy and colluded with the media and clinton campaign to steal, outright steal the election from Bernie sanders. That's gotta be illegal somehow. I mean, what's the point of our system once it's been proven the democrats can just rob citizens of their right to a fair vote?

Definitely not illegal. What law does it violate?

Shit and then the hacks proved that Hillary was given the debate questions before hand so she could prep. The debates are a huge part of our process.

The debates are run by a private organization, largely funded by the two major political parties. The US Constitution defines our electoral process, and it mentions nothing of political parties or presidential debates.
 
Was he open and upfront about these ?
Kenya

Investigative reporter Jerome Corsi of WorldNetDaily broke this story when he visited Kenya and was able to confirm that Obama, as a U.S. Senator, illegally used a taxpayer-financed trip to campaign for far-left presidential candidate Raila Odinga in Kenya’s 2006 elections.

Odinga, according to the BBC, was distantly related to Obama and both families belonged to the Luo tribe. Indeed, both of their fathers served in the administration of Jomo Kenyatta in the 1960s. According to a document obtained by Corsi, Odinga promised Kenya’s growing Islamic movement that if elected, he would “rewrite the constitution of Kenya to recognize Sharia as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared religions.” The secret agreement also called for the creation of Muslim “madrassa classes,” a crackdown on Christian evangelical events and gospel programs, and legal protections for Muslims suspected of terrorism, even international terrorism.
Obama’s cheerleading for anti-American Odinga (who named his son after Fidel Castro) “was more than reckless,” wrote former U.S. attorney Andrew McCarthy, “it was borderline criminal (and that’s being generous).” McCarthy also said Obama’s intervention was an “outrageous contravention of U.S. policy and, [referring to the Logan Act] probably, federal law.”
By 2010, this tribal connection resulted in President Obama quietly transferring millions of U.S. tax dollars to Odinga’s government, including $2 million to convince Kenyan voters to vote for a new constitution. According to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, the new constitution would force Kenyans to be “subjected to these [Islamic] tribunals merely by virtue of what religious community they were born into…” Some members of Congress actually called for an investigation but, typically, nothing ever came of it. By the end of 2010, hundreds of millions of dollars flowed to Kenya from a myriad of U.S. agencies such as USAID, all with the likely intent of boosting the popularity of the Odinga regime.

Israel

During Israel’s 2015 elections, the Obama administration — led by Secretary of State John Kerry — illegally intervened when they attempted to defeat the reelection of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by covertly funneling State Department grants to opposition groups. The Obama administration detested Netanyahu due to his refusal to cave into Palestinian demands, a group that even refused to recognize the existence of Israel.

Obama’s State Department gave $350,000 to a group called the “One Voice Movement (OVM),” for supporting “peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine.” However, the State Department then used leftover funds to organize an effort against Netanyahu’s reelection. OVM contracted out a group called “V15,” which in turned hired five campaign experts from the U.S., including Obama’s field director from his last presidential campaign. As the Weekly Standard’s Jim Swift wrote, “once the infrastructure was built, it was used in an attempt to topple the government of one of America’s closest allies.”

An investigation by the U.S. Senate found that the “State Department failed to adequately guard against the risk that resources built with government grants would be deployed for political purposes.” As with most investigations of Obama scandals, emails documenting this illegal election activity were destroyed. And, as usual, no one was held accountable.

Macedonia

The government watchdog group, Judicial Watch, obtained government documents that “show the U.S. government has quietly spent millions of taxpayer dollars to destabilize the democratically elected, center-right government in Macedonia by colluding with leftwing, billionaire philanthropist George Soros.” Indeed, Obama’s ambassador to Macedonia, Jeff Baily, worked to funnel millions of dollars from the State Department and USAID to groups created by Soros which were, according to JW, working to overthrow the conservative government.

More details about this intervention were exposed by Victor Gaetan in a series of exposés in The American Spectator. Gaetan has confirmed that Soros, in conjuction with the Obama administration, “financed a left-wing agenda to divide the nation and bring a socialist-Muslim coalition to power.” Incredibly, Obama’s USAID “selected Soros’ Foundation Open Society Macedonia (FOSM) to manage $2.5 million in taxpayers’ dollars earmarked for oxymoronic ‘democracy building,’ an amount increased to $4.8 million two years later.”

This funding was directed to a coalition of socialist groups that work in conjunction with the Social Democrat Union of Macedonia (SDSM), a socialist party with close ties to Soros. The intervention is, incredibly, still ongoing with the result being chaos and disruptive street demonstrations. Gaetan’s investigative work also indicates that Obama’s agencies intervened politically with a number of other Balkan counties, including Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania and Greece. It appears the Trump administration knows little about such interventions since many leftist Obama-appointed ambassadors continue to hold on to their positions. And USAID funds continue to pour into leftist political groups in the Balkans as if Trump never came to power. Indeed, as one Macedonia Member of Parliament quoted by Gaetan said, “Under Obama’s ideological programs, it [USAID] became the super crack of the left.”

Libya

In 2011, Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, not only interfered politically in Libya but militarily as well, by orchestrating a series of policies designed to remove Muammar Gaddafi from power. While it would be a stretch to call Gaddafi a U.S. ally, he was cooperating with the U.S.A. in fighting Islamic extremists and had turned over all his WMDs to American officials. Western investment was flowing into Libya, the country was becoming more westernized and, most certainly, it was no longer a threat to the USA.

As NR wrote, “all that vanished when Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice ordered the bombings that turned Libya into a terrorist paradise.” One explanation for the abrupt attack on Libya was that Gaddafi was a rival to the Saudis over the leadership of the Islamic faith and since the Saudis had contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, Secretary Clinton had, as usual, a money motive to intervene in Libya.

The opposition to Gaddafi’s regime was led by the Libyan Transitional National Council, whose leaders include many radical Muslims such as Abdel Hakim Belhaj. Belhaj also headed an al-Qaeda affiliate called the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which was designated a terrorist organization by the State Department.

Nevertheless, Obama spent at least $1 billion to fund a military operation to topple Gaddafi, with American soldiers actually fighting alongside jihadist-dominated rebel groups. Moreover, the Washington Times reported that the “CIA was providing covert assistance to elements of the Transitional National Council,” again, a group dominated by radical jihadists. Under Obama, Libya was transformed from a moderate Islamic regime which posed no threat to the USA, to a violent wasteland dominated by various ISIS and al-Qaeda linked militias.

Honduras

Shortly after Obama was elected, leftist Honduran president Manual Zelaya attempted to illegally amend the Honduran Constitution so as to allow himself to serve as President longer than one term. Incredibly, Zelaya and a mob broke into a military installation where blank ballots were stored and tried to hold a constitutional referendum without the support of the election authorities. As a result, on orders from the Honduran Supreme Court, he was forcefully removed from office as Honduran law calls for.

Obama attacked Zelaya’s removal, falsely calling it a “coup d’état” and a WikiLeaks cable revealed that Obama backed Zelaya’s reinstatement in order to please Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, who, like Fidel Castro, was an ally of Zelaya. Instead of supporting the right of Hondurans to remove their president for unconstitutional actions, Obama tried to pressure Honduras into reinstating Zelaya by freezing all non-humanitarian aid. That didn’t happen and Zelaya went into exile.

Eventually, new elections were held and a new president elected, but there’s little doubt that the Obama administration meddled in the Honduran political process in an effort to support the hard left in that country. Indeed, when Obama announced that he supported the return of Zelaya from exile, Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen announced “Now that everything is in place for Zelaya’s return, there are no more false reasons for the Obama administration to continue its pressure tactics against those in Honduras who opposed Zelaya’s attacks on their country’s constitution and the rule of law.”

Egypt

Like Libya, the Obama administration encouraged opposition to President Hosni Mubarak and intervened in elections to ensure that a radical Muslim Brotherhood leader, Mohammed Morsi, was elected president. Obama’s State Department even gave political training to MB leaders. Again, similar to Gadhafi, Mubarak was relatively secular and Egypt was becoming increasingly westernized. He was an ally of the U.S.A. and an opponent of radical jihadists.

And the Obama administration was open about its efforts. The Los Angeles Times reported that the “Obama administration said for the first time that it supports a role for groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, a banned islamist organization…” The MB’s mission statement states, “Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” Sounds like a group Obama would support. Indeed, one of the Egyptian MB leaders, Gehad el-Haddad, was actually on the Clinton Foundation payroll while working to help bring the MB to power. Once Morsi appeared to win what was likely a rigged election, Obama poured in $1.5 billion in foreign aid.

The Egyptian people were so upset with Obama’s intervention, they forcefully removed Morsi and installed a pro-American moderate Muslim named Abdel Fattah al-Sisi as president. Morsi was then arrested by the Egyptian military for treason. But even after that, as reported by Western Journalism, Obama’s “State Department hosts Muslim Brotherhood-aligned leaders” in order to “work against this world-be reformer’s government.”
Nobodys reading that motherfucker <DisgustingHHH>
 
And most of the WR will say we are idiots

Everything now is politics first. We have a Mod posting in here threatening a guy about derailing for asking a legit question. Meanwhile 90% of that mods posts are partisan Shit posts
Stop whining you pussy
 
LOL. When did you Resistance Retards ever complain about US meddling. You guys seem to love the FBI and CIA now. You know, those organizations that helped George W. Bush lie us into war in Iraq.
Me? The first time I learned about the bullshit we tried to pull in Vietnam. That was back when I was 16 or so. Speaking of Vietnam, I seem to remember learning that a significant number of Americans were against that war. Maybe you should have paid better attention in school.
 
What hypocrisy? Putting our nation's interests first means that we interfere with them but we try to stop them from interfering with us.

The issue isn't that Putin/Russia tried to interfere with our elections. The issue is that Americans supported it and defended it.

The only hypocrisy is when anyone who claims patriotism and championing our country decides that they're fine with it. We might interfere in other people's elections but they don't turn around and say "We're glad that America is screwing with our country to advance America's interests." They have more self-respect than that.

Yet millions of Americans are doing exactly that here. They're championing Russia's interests over the interests of the United States. It doesn't matter how anyone feels about HRC. Americans should have an interest in preserving the sanctity of our internal democracy that supersedes foreign influence. They should never be willing to throw our elections under the bus for a foreign power.

How did they "meddle" with our elections?
 
What hypocrisy? Putting our nation's interests first means that we interfere with them but we try to stop them from interfering with us.

The issue isn't that Putin/Russia tried to interfere with our elections. The issue is that Americans supported it and defended it.

The only hypocrisy is when anyone who claims patriotism and championing our country decides that they're fine with it. We might interfere in other people's elections but they don't turn around and say "We're glad that America is screwing with our country to advance America's interests." They have more self-respect than that.

Yet millions of Americans are doing exactly that here. They're championing Russia's interests over the interests of the United States. It doesn't matter how anyone feels about HRC. Americans should have an interest in preserving the sanctity of our internal democracy that supersedes foreign influence. They should never be willing to throw our elections under the bus for a foreign power.
/thread ,....see,if u take all the whining, derailing and whataboutism away this thread would have been 1 page long
 
Definitely not illegal. What law does it violate?



The debates are run by a private organization, largely funded by the two major political parties. The US Constitution defines our electoral process, and it mentions nothing of political parties or presidential debates.
<WellThere>
Commies not giving a flying fuck about democracy. Nothing new on the front.
 
This attempt to portray Putin as an honest man of integrity is stunning to watch.

You bots are intellectually and morally bankrupt traitors.
 
Russia shit posted on Facebook and hacked the DNC. Did they do anything else?

While it would have been cool if the RNC was hacked as well, at least we found out the Democratic Party destroyed all semblance of democracy and colluded with the media and clinton campaign to steal, outright steal the election from Bernie sanders. That's gotta be illegal somehow. I mean, what's the point of our system once it's been proven the democrats can just rob citizens of their right to a fair vote?

Shit and then the hacks proved that Hillary was given the debate questions before hand so she could prep. The debates are a huge part of our process. Now we can never trust them again. I mean the cheating was never denied and the media told people not to care.

Are you telling me it was wrong of us Americans to want to know that truth? How shifty it is to have to get the truth from outside sources but truth is still truth.

All Americans should be happy the truth came out.

Aren't you?

They can't see the obvious truth, bro.

They are fox news (only) fan of 10-15 years ago going coo-coo off the kool-aid. They speak in talking points, and believe in things consistently eluded to, but never proven by "their" news networks. Like old fox news fan, you can't reach the common sense part of their brain, because the politics propaganda has put up a wall in their brain that keeps them from going deep into it.. Which I'm starting to think is the point of a lot of it.
 
This attempt to portray Putin as an honest man of integrity is stunning to watch.

You bots are intellectually and morally bankrupt traitors.

Did somebody do that? He's a rich leader and long-time politician in a country with a good amount of corruption; we know what he is and what he has to be to be in the position he is in. It's your recent demonizing of the guy, at the direction of the news networks who were *cough* caught meddling in our last election, that is actually pretty comical.
 
Back
Top