- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 5,011
- Reaction score
- 0
Storm front much, bro?
I think some author framed this correctly, in his question. Since pro lifers seem to think embryos are babies, if you came across a fire in which there was a baby, and a thousand embryos, and you could only save one, which would you choose?
So, all else being equal, you'd save a non-pregnant woman from a fire, rather than the pregnant one?
So, all else being equal, you'd save a non-pregnant woman from a fire, rather than the pregnant one?
Both women are sentient human beings. Let me put it this way, I would save a woman and her baby over a woman who was pregnant, because the baby, toddler, or whatever age, is conscious, and able to experience pain.
Are you seriously saying an unborn child cannot experience pain?Both women are sentient human beings. Let me put it this way, I would save a woman and her baby over a woman who was pregnant, because the baby, toddler, or whatever age, is conscious, and able to experience pain.
Avoiding the question does not answer it.Both women are sentient human beings. Let me put it this way, I would save a woman and her baby over a woman who was pregnant, because the baby, toddler, or whatever age, is conscious, and able to experience pain.
Are you seriously saying an unborn child cannot experience pain?
Was really amazing how fake news, really was shiting over Trump day and day out about locker room talk and whatnot that happen a long time ago, repeteably the same subject over and over for months.