- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 52,701
- Reaction score
- 24,720
She was and Trump wasn't......before the election. But Trump has done a 180 on his stanceLOL @ any of the fucking idiots who claimed that Hillary was a much bigger warhawk.
She was and Trump wasn't......before the election. But Trump has done a 180 on his stanceLOL @ any of the fucking idiots who claimed that Hillary was a much bigger warhawk.
Probably for not sucking Trumps balls hard enough.Any idea what he's being held accountable for in this instance?
She was and Trump wasn't......before the election. But Trump has done a 180 on his stance
It's amazing how you guys just make up your own reality
I love how everytime Trump fires someone the left goes from hating that person to defending that person.
do tell of all the wars and invasions trump has started
She was and Trump wasn't......before the election. But Trump has done a 180 on his stance
But overall he was seen as non-interventionist. He is America First, and if you look into the roots of America First, it is non-interventionism.Trump was all over the place during the primaries and general election campaigns. People interpreted his gibberish however they wanted to based on their own baises.
Despite the fact that he was just doing it to take a cheap shot at Jeb Bush and the Bush family and the fact that he actually supported the invasion at the time, he does deserve some credit for repeatedly calling bullshit on the GOP establishment for perpetrating the Iraq war.
However, he also made many belligerent statements about "bombing the crap out of the Middle East," indiscriminately killing "terrorists," their families and, by extension, civilian bystanders (which he has done since easing the rules of engagement) and repeatedly mused about using nuclear weapons.
It was asinine to assume that anybody with his childish temperament would pursue a dovish foreign policy.
Unbelievable that someone so closely involved in the Iraq war can make a political comeback.
Trump was all over the place during the primaries and general election campaigns. People interpreted his gibberish however they wanted to based on their own baises.
Despite the fact that he was just doing it to take a cheap shot at Jeb Bush and the Bush family and the fact that he actually supported the invasion at the time, he does deserve some credit for repeatedly calling bullshit on the GOP establishment for perpetrating the Iraq war.
However, he also made many belligerent statements about "bombing the crap out of the Middle East," indiscriminately killing "terrorists," their families and, by extension, civilian bystanders (which he has done since easing the rules of engagement) and repeatedly mused about using nuclear weapons.
It was asinine to assume that anybody with his childish temperament would pursue a dovish foreign policy.
That's the dumbest thing I ever heard. He openly campaigned on being against all wars, bringing troops home, closing bases, and ending NATO.
You must have not been paying attention to his campaign. He labeled all others war minders and the war mongers hated him
Trumps campaign will be studied for years. He basically took every position in every subject to please everyone and just went from one position to another depending who he was talking to. You could see 2 people debate trumps position and say completely different things and both using trumps words as their reason and be right. That was the beauty of having no record.....but you would have thought eventually people would see he was full of shit.Lol he said so many ridiculous things in the campaign. He said there would be no war in the same speeches he said his secret strategy (which he totally has but can't say because he doesn't want terrorists to know it) would defeat Iraq in a month because he knows more about the military than the generals who run it.
Only morons believed any part of that.
Trumps campaign will be studied for years. He basically took every position in every subject to please everyone and just went from one position to another depending who he was talking to. You could see 2 people debate trumps position and say completely different things and both using trumps words as their reason and be right. That was the beauty of having no record.....but you would have thought eventually people would see he was full of shit.
Trumps campaign will be studied for years. He basically took every position in every subject to please everyone and just went from one position to another depending who he was talking to. You could see 2 people debate trumps position and say completely different things and both using trumps words as their reason and be right. That was the beauty of having no record.....but you would have thought eventually people would see he was full of shit.
do tell of all the wars and invasions trump has started
LOL @ any of the fucking idiots who claimed that Hillary was a much bigger warhawk.
More likely Iran. Trump knows that Russia and China won't let him play in NK, and hundreds of thousands of South Koreas would be killed. In Iran there is no ally population close that would be targeted in retribution like how NK leverages SK.