- Joined
- May 25, 2008
- Messages
- 9,254
- Reaction score
- 979
Even he had lost those fight officially, he'd still kill Conor.
Castillo literally did nothing the first 5 rounds, he turned it up later but he lost the whole.begining of that fight.
Most of the punches Castillo landed were in two rounds..
Listening to some people talk boxing is hilarious
Floyd won that, and absolutely won the rematch
Im sorry but floyd didn't lose 7 rounds after that.Him losing the first 5 rounds means nothing when Floyd lost the last 7 rounds. Castillo landed more punches and also thrown more punches, plus that 10-8 round makes it ever worse for him. It's simple, I throw 100 punches and land 60 of them, it's going to show more success then someone throwing 60 and landing 20, it's simply common sense on who ends up having more success, doesn't have to be pretty otherwise the guy who the nicest technique would always win.
It was close, but Castillo won no question, if it wasn't for that 10-8 round I would score it a draw.
I did, Castillo thrown and landed more punches then Floyd, even the stats shown so. How else is a fight measure by success if the success on the amount punches you have are moot ?Im sorry but floyd didn't lose 7 rounds after that.
Floyd undoubtedly won the last two rounds, i mean did you even watch the fight?
Seriously watch the last two rounds and come back and try and claim Castillo won.
Fights are measured in rounds, like i said most of Castillos punches came in two rounds, very dirty rounds might i add, with lowblows and headbutts, castilio slowed down and lost the last two rounds and every judge also gave him round 10 which was close.I did, Castillo thrown and landed more punches then Floyd, even the stats shown so. How else is a fight measure by success if the success on the amount punches you have are moot ?
Fights are measured in rounds, like i said most of Castillos punches came in two rounds, very dirty rounds might i add, with lowblows and headbutts, castilio slowed down and lost the last two rounds and every judge also gave him round 10 which was close.
After mayweather won the first 5-6 rounds there's absolutely zero chance that Castillo sweeped 7 rounds.
I mean round 11 he got jabbed plodding forward that whole round, i dont understand how anyone could give that round to castillo.
Then floyd really shut him out in the rematch, close fight, but not a loss.
Because you're wrong, floyd outlanded Castillo in round 10 and 12.And then how are the round measure to find which Boxer had the most success ? It's simple, by the amount of punches thrown + the amount of punches landed. He won round 6 and so on, he landed more punches, as well thrown more punches, and had far better success then what Floyd had done in comparison. Zero chance ? Bro how can there be zero chance of him sweeping when in every round after Round 5, Castillo threw more and landed more then Floyd ? The only reason why Floyd won the first 5 rounds was because he thrown and landed more, yet Castillo throwing more and landing more after from round 6 to 12 is now moot ?
Castillo won that fair and square, it was close, but that 10-8 round really settled the the whole thing, if it was 10-9, I would score it a draw.
1. De la hoya
2. castillo
3. maidana 1
most boxing fans agree. he had a few other very close fights.
1. I was there, rooting my ass off for De la Hoya, but no fuckin way he beat Floyd.1. De la hoya
2. castillo
3. maidana 1
most boxing fans agree. he had a few other very close fights.
First fight Castillo did well, I didn't feel the win was controversial but was first time Floyd was ever pushed that hard in a fight having to keep a forward charging aggressive puncher off him.Cant remember didnt he fight Castillo twice? I vaguely remember the Castillo fight being controversial but not sure if it was 1 or 2
I have to question anyone that scored that fight for Gus if they actually scored the fight objectively.Gustaffson won 3 rounds if you really look at the fight objectively so your example is terrible.