Snowflake,
I'm not about to type out an entire chapter to you. When Bas is thinking Funaki is taking him out to dinner to ask him to throw a fight....When Frank wasn't sure what was real and what wasn't, among other things, that's an interesting read. You can believe the fighters that said their fights weren't fixed while others fights were if you so desire.
Guy Mezger claiming only four or five fights were fixed would indicate that he was involved in every discussion with regards to every fight with management? That's riveting. Tell us more.
Hey, paperboy...
I believe u didnt get what I said. I just dont give a damn about ur book. This is ONE version of the story.
I consider Bas and Frank reliable dudes, but Guy is reliable too, he has always been an articulate and intelligent person.
This is the difference btw u & me: I respected ur Bas & Frank references, while ure cluelessly dismissin´ Guy´s own experience.
Hence...U know what? Instead of spittin ur blablabla..
Right now, we dont know about ur opinion, ure only REPEATING the writer´s opinion like a parrot.
So BE CONSTRUCTIVE:
U said that MOST OF THE FIGHTS were fixed? Pretty easy to say somethin´like this, but u have to show it:
Give us 5-10 examples (should be easy if most were fixed) and lets study:
1/The context of the fight
[ex: some people say the Taktarov vs Macias fight was fixed... but Taktarov = LHW, Macias = WW...]
2/The objective
[did it make sense to fix the fight?]
3/ The decisive & suspect move of the fight
[a suspect RNC, or leg lock]
Its not that difficult to assess whether a fight is suspect or not...
Or u need the writer´s opinion to express ur own?
The 2nd Rickson vs Rei Zulu is suspect...
The Funaki vs Ken is suspect...
The Coleman vs Takada is suspect..
Ace vs Ken is suspect (amateurish leglock attempt)..
etcetc
Heck.. even Cormier vs Rumble 2 could be suspect...
PS: remember:
1- we´re talkin about FIXED fights, not CARRY JOBS.
2- someone payin a fighter to fight his ass out of a sub, is a different thing