Idk what the argument is.
I don’t mind you coming off as an asshole so long as you make a valid point.
I see the argument going only one of two ways. Either a Davis defenders Can day that he is too young and loma is picking on a kid(see my point about Canelo), or the payday Davis would see wouldn’t justify the Lomachenko asswhopping he would get.
If I’m missing something or if my legit is faulty, please let me know.
I'm not defending Davis, I don't get what you're trying to say either, tbh. Maybe we're lost in translation, literally and/or figuratively?
I don't like being an asshole to ppl who don't deserve it. I think your comparison of Tank fighting Loma and Canelo fighting Floyd is a terrible comparison. Just b/c a fighter is the same age when he fights a great fighter doesn't make them the same quality at the time they fight one another.
Canelo was considered a "live dog" against Floyd, ppl were actually giving him a semi legit shot to beat Floyd. Canelo had been a pro for many years, and had much more experience both pro and resume wise. Tank is a prospect, for sure, but Canelo was not only a prospect but a proven fighter and had been hyped as the next big thing for a longtime prior.
Comparing the two just b/c they're similar in age doesn't make the comparison justified. Canelo was a huge name in boxing and for good reason. Why is Tank a big name, what has he done to deserve the hype other than being Floyd's protege and having a high ko % and beating two decent fighters at most? Canelo was also making weight and not going to court for a bunch of bullshit at that age. He had his shit together and had a much better overall skillset, mindset, and resume than Tank could dream of.
All belt holders are not the same, all ppl who are the same age when they fight a great fighter are not the same. Comparing Tank to Canelo based on age and having a belt doesn't make them the same. Not even close, it's a terrible comparison. Canelo was coming off of a win over an unbeaten Austin Trout at 154, that alone should make the comparison dumb, but Canelo had wins over names, over the hill names at times, but at least they were proven and sturdy comp. Tank has done nothing of the sort.
Again not trying to be a dick but objectively it's not worth comparing the two b/c Canelo was light years better and more proven at his age than Tank is rn. I don't think you understand just how good Canelo was at 22 y/o, if I thought you did then maybe I would've been harder on you. Kid gloves from me b/c I honestly just don't think you get that it's a bad comparison, man.