- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 11,629
- Reaction score
- 1,864
Lol!!wtf is happening to these forums? I mean, I always knew we were all dumb, but this is another level
Post of the year!
Lol!!wtf is happening to these forums? I mean, I always knew we were all dumb, but this is another level
Nothing new here. You know damn well where you are.Where am I ???
Haha thanks. I don’t know if it’s me just literally sick and confused but yesterday i saw a ton of weird threads hahaLol!!
Post of the year!
If you want to say that Anderson Silva and Jon Jones are not GOAT status because of steroid usage, that is fine, we are all entitled to our unreasonable religious superiority beliefs. However, logically, it doesn't make sense.
My question is this, how much down the ranking does steroid usage demote a fighter? It is easy to say "GSP is the GOAT over Jon Jones, because GSP never tested positive for steroids." Fine. But what about a guy like Paul Craig who has a record of 1-2 in the UFC, is he also better than Jon Jones because he has never tested positive for steroids?
How many of you can seriously say Paul Craig and CB Dollaway are more deserving of GOAT status than Jon Jones, because they never tested positive for steroids?
If you can't say it with confidence, then steroids don't affect GOAT talk. If you can say it with confidence, then we have to agree that GOAT talk is not based on fighting ability.
With most players, sure. But with Bonds everyone knows pretty much exactly when he started due to the extreme change in physical appearance, coinciding precisely with the extreme performance gains (at a very late stage in his career, at that), coinciding with the findings of the Balco investigations.
Twas not a subtle transformation:
That’s hilariousFAIL
Just because you say it is, it doesn't mean that it is so. Especially, when you are not even presenting a counter argument. You are just throwing shit at the wall and hoping that something sticks.Your reasoning is extremely faulty. How about examine your own post for errors before accusing others of faulty "logic".
Just because you say it is, it doesn't mean that it is so. Especially, when you are not even presenting a counter argument. You are just throwing shit at the wall and hoping that something sticks.
Make a counter argument or don't waste your time.