- Joined
- Apr 6, 2017
- Messages
- 718
- Reaction score
- 0
yeah but it is a fight he wonWhen he won the title, it was a fight he should have lost.
yeah but it is a fight he wonWhen he won the title, it was a fight he should have lost.
you win the interwebz today! lolTS came to a battle of wits unarmed
exactly... lawler is was a beast.He beat Pre Usada Hendricks and finished a prime Rory Macdonald.
Troll, or not. He's right. Robbie is a one dimensional fighter who grabbed some favorable match-ups and the stars aligned.
Rory was probably his biggest win, but that's because Rory played his game. I think Rory takes him any other time.
Hendricks? Who cares.
you cant say that when Rory just had a flawless performance over Daley who just KO'd LarkinYet everyone thinks Rory mcdonald would be the welterweight champ and lawler litterally took 10 years off his life.
If he's so one dimensional why didn't RDA submit him when he was on top? Why was Robbie able to get back to his feet? Why did he stuff a lot of RDA's takedowns? Just because his offense is primarily boxing doesn't make him one dimensional, otherwise he'd be Houston Alexander.Troll, or not. He's right. Robbie is a one dimensional fighter who grabbed some favorable match-ups and the stars aligned.
Rory was probably his biggest win, but that's because Rory played his game. I think Rory takes him any other time.
Hendricks? Who cares.
you cant say that when Rory just had a flawless performance over Daley who just KO'd Larkin
they fought twice, hendrick was pre usda who arguably beat gsp in his prime, condit is a killer and cerrone isn't as shitty as you fair weather fans think.Troll, or not. He's right. Robbie is a one dimensional fighter who grabbed some favorable match-ups and the stars aligned.
Rory was probably his biggest win, but that's because Rory played his game. I think Rory takes him any other time.
Hendricks? Who cares.