Lake Monsters and Sea Serpents

[TheFakeMacoy]

Not all "lake monster" sightings are fake, it just depends on your definition of a monster. Take for instance, this giant sturgeon found in BC. If you saw this swimming around, you'd think it was a monster too.

https://bc.ctvnews.ca/fishing-guide-catches-750-lb-monster-sturgeon-in-epic-battle-1.2927108

 

[HI SCOTT NEWMAN]

Fascinating stuff. As a keep fisher myself I can't say I ever seen a lake monster, but its very interesting. I have caught a few weird looking small fish before though.

 

[Fluffernutter]

Champ, the Lake Champlain "monster" is actually two male sturgeon fish fighting over territory.

Two long fish pushing into each other can give the allusion of a huge serpent.

Plus, most sightings are around sturgeon spawning season.

 

[El Chimpo]

I'm so fuckin sick and tired of the photoshop.

Doesnt look like anyone caught this kendrick reference

 

[Theoctagon]

I'm a skeptic but I'm sure they're are giant sea/ lake creatures that do exist. The giant squid wasn't caught on tape until the early 2000s

 

[BearGrounds]

LOL I knew BearGrounds would quickly show up to tell all the doubters of some of these cartoonishly fake youtube videos how dumb they are. We just gotta open our minds to the photoshop, right BearGrounds?

Great point about the ocean in this thread about LAKES by the way BG. Solid analysis as always.

Lol rent free. As always.

 

[Agent Mulder's Hair]

LOL I knew BearGrounds would quickly show up to tell all the doubters of some of these cartoonishly fake youtube videos how dumb they are. We just gotta open our minds to the photoshop, right BearGrounds?

Great point about the ocean in this thread about LAKES by the way BG. Solid analysis as always.

^ looks like somebody doesn't know what a LOCH is.

Hey genius, get to googling.

 

[Kanuck99]

You can see my trouser snake for a small fee.

 

[DoomPatrol]

Inb4 people who've never bothered to look into the phenomena for themselves, tell you you're a fool for believing any of it possible because their science overlords haven't confirmed it yet.

Meanwhile, less than 5% of our oceans have even been explored, and there are video taped images of supposed sleeper sharks of enormous size we didn't even think possible - never to have been caught on tape ever again; so it's not even confirmed.

But yea, we've seen it all and no undiscovered species of large size could possibly be out there.

<puh-lease75>

That statistic is such a crock of bullshit. And the idea that the Sleeper Shark is "sizes we can't imagine" is retarded. That wasn't even filmed in the Marina Trench, it was filmed in Suruga Bay. So no, it's not some 50' long monster shark we couldn't have imagined. It's a normal sized shark that's well known by our "science overlords", aka people who actually have a fucking education.

You sound about as intelligent as the guy in that meme you posted at the end. There's no Loch Ness and there's no Megalodons creeping around our oceans. We've been fishing, diving, swimming, and exploring the oceans for centuries and if something was that large with a sufficient enough population to breed for thousands of years to the current day, then we would certainly know about it especially if it was in a tiny fucking Loch and not the deep ocean.

 

[Medulla Omoplata]

If the loch ness was real the Japanese would have eaten it in a strange and disgusting manner and also somehow made an animated pornography out of it.

 

[Zookeeper Gabe]

As a zookeeper.


No

 

[rj144]

Inb4 people who've never bothered to look into the phenomena for themselves, tell you you're a fool for believing any of it possible because their science overlords haven't confirmed it yet.

Meanwhile, less than 5% of our oceans have even been explored, and there are video taped images of supposed sleeper sharks of enormous size we didn't even think possible - never to have been caught on tape ever again; so it's not even confirmed.

But yea, we've seen it all and no undiscovered species of large size could possibly be out there.

<puh-lease75>

That shark was 23 feet long. It's large but not unusual at all.

 

[blaseblah]

Watch the show River Monsters. There's a lot of cool things under the water, certainly more interesting than blurry distorted images of geese

 

[BearGrounds]

That statistic is such a crock of bullshit. And the idea that the Sleeper Shark is sizes we can't imagine is retarded. That wasn't even filmed in the Marina Trench, it was filmed in Suruga Bay. So no, it's not some 50' long monster shark we couldn't have imagined. It's a normal sized shark that's well known by our "science overlords", aka people who actually have a fucking education.

You sound about as intelligent as the guy in that meme you posted at the end. There's no Loch Ness and there's no Megalodons creeping around our oceans. We've been fishing, diving, swimming, and exploring the oceans for centuries and if something was that large with a sufficient enough population to breed for thousands of years to the current day, then we would certainly know about it especially if it was in a tiny fucking Loch and not the deep ocean.

How much of the ocean have we explored?

To date, we have explored less than five percent of the ocean.

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/exploration.html

And he didn't say it was filmed in the trench, dummy.

 

[The_Renaissance]

Probably my favourite subject matter to read about! Love all that.

I know it's not a lake monster, but of all the water creatures worldwide, cadborosaurus off the coast of Canada is the one for me - I've read so much convincing, consistent stuff about that, I'm convinced its a real animal.

 

[Bacco]

I'm open to the idea of unknown large sea creatures

I think lakes/rivers ones are bullshit though

Big fish can probably create gigantic waves in a lake looking as impression multiple times theyr actual size

Italian fisherman caught this shit in freshwaters

Imagine the waves something like that can cause in a lake quiet surface, then put it on youtube

 

[Soul Crusher]

Not all "lake monster" sightings are fake, it just depends on your definition of a monster. Take for instance, this giant sturgeon found in BC. If you saw this swimming around, you'd think it was a monster too.

https://bc.ctvnews.ca/fishing-guide-catches-750-lb-monster-sturgeon-in-epic-battle-1.2927108

Not all lake monster sighting are sturgeons. Could it account for some? Definitely take a look at this video.



Poor guy got chopped up pretty bad by a propeller. Even his fin got sliced.

What is shown in the videos I posted are not sturgeons though.

 

[Soul Crusher]

Champ, the Lake Champlain "monster" is actually two male sturgeon fish fighting over territory.

Two long fish pushing into each other can give the allusion of a huge serpent.

Plus, most sightings are around sturgeon spawning season.

These creatures are exposing themselves above the water. Too many eyewitnesses describe the same thing. Definitely not a sturgeon.




This is the best non photoshopped picture of champ

 

[Soul Crusher]

As a zookeeper.


No

 

[Soul Crusher]

Probably my favourite subject matter to read about! Love all that.

I know it's not a lake monster, but of all the water creatures worldwide, cadborosaurus off the coast of Canada is the one for me - I've read so much convincing, consistent stuff about that, I'm convinced its a real animal.

I might have to add the ocean serpents in the future because there's a lot of sightings as well.