- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 4,444
- Reaction score
- 2,341
Oh fuck off already with your propaganda, you're the one advertising ranking in Muay Thai for fuck sake.
Rank? In Muay Thai.
Not in my America.
Oh fuck off already with your propaganda, you're the one advertising ranking in Muay Thai for fuck sake.
Please give supporting evidence that Funakoshi fought and prevailed consistently.
Show them? You only know how to write and it shows nothing!
Read the book of Jon Bluming there you will have a surprise
you realize that the origins of karate pre-date Funakoshi right?
As mentioned before what documented evidence do you have of Kano ever fighting and winning, or are you just going based off of his book?
just more UFC NPCs repeating what ever the line of the week is.Karate's history predates Funikoshi and predates Japan. Funikoshi's teacher was a guy named Anko Itosu. He created the 5 initial kata, the Heians. Itosu's teacher was a guy named Matsumura Sōkon. Sokon was the main bodyguard to the King of Okinawa and his martial arts teacher.
It's highly unlikely the chief bodyguard to the king and his primary teacher didn't know how to actually fight. And early karate wasn't just hand to hand fighting, it involved learning multiple weapons as well.
When people think about karate as not having more combat experience, it's mostly because they're only thinking about the karate that ended up in Japan decades later. That karate wasn't as focused on combat as the Okinawan karate. But that lack of focus isn't because of the kata or even the kihon. It's because combat wasn't the focus in Japan, a country with plenty of it's own martial arts in grappling, striking, and weapons.
It's one more reason to not discard the core kata since they were designed around actual combat, unlike the culture that came later.
Karate's history predates Funikoshi and predates Japan. Funikoshi's teacher was a guy named Anko Itosu. He created the 5 initial kata, the Heians. Itosu's teacher was a guy named Matsumura Sōkon. Sokon was the main bodyguard to the King of Okinawa and his martial arts teacher.
It's highly unlikely the chief bodyguard to the king and his primary teacher didn't know how to actually fight. And early karate wasn't just hand to hand fighting, it involved learning multiple weapons as well.
When people think about karate as not having more combat experience, it's mostly because they're only thinking about the karate that ended up in Japan decades later. That karate wasn't as focused on combat as the Okinawan karate. But that lack of focus isn't because of the kata or even the kihon. It's because combat wasn't the focus in Japan, a country with plenty of it's own martial arts in grappling, striking, and weapons.
It's one more reason to not discard the core kata since they were designed around actual combat, unlike the culture that came later.
Is Karate Preceding Japan? Before Japan it would be before the Jomon Period that were the pmerces Japanese occupations. Before this period there was nothing either martial arts or weapons. Not even in Okinawa. Before this period the abitates of this place worked with stones. It was after that that they traded to use ceramics.
Another thing you quote a legend without any historical proof.
Kata have never been preparing for a real fight. If you force the fighters Karate and Kung Fu were the best in the world.
If you want to live in illusion the problem is not mine, this covers for me waxes here!
Is Karate Preceding Japan? Before Japan it would be before the Jomon Period that were the pmerces Japanese occupations. Before this period there was nothing either martial arts or weapons. Not even in Okinawa. Before this period the abitates of this place worked with stones. It was after that that they traded to use ceramics.
Another thing you quote a legend without any historical proof.
Kata have never been preparing for a real fight. If you force the fighters Karate and Kung Fu were the best in the world.
If you want to live in illusion the problem is not mine, this covers for me waxes here!
@fighthug, you've totally convinced all of us.Ok, you're right. There are no writings related to karate written by the Japanese based on information from Okinawa. Japan didn't conquer the Okinawa Islands and so had no first hand experience with whether or not the Okinawans could fight. The Okinawans didn't claim that many of their most important kata had origins in Chinese martial arts. And the Chinese certainly had no combat experience either.
Glad we've cleared that up.
wish I could use emojis to laugh at this lol@fighthug, you've totally convinced all of us.
Okinawans never fought anyone, even each other.
Karate was never used in actual combat, by anyone.
All stories about Karate people winning fights are fake.
All written evidence of Karate people winning fights are fake.
All modern video of Karate people winning fights are fake.
No fighter ever used any Karate techniques in ring or cage successfully.
That whole Machida winning a UFC belt story was totally fabricated.
GSP is a liar or getting paid by Kyokushin orgs to credit the art for his success.
Whittaker is getting paid by Goju orgs to say he uses that style.
Same shit with Wonderboy and many other so-called "Karateka" in kickboxing and MMA.
It's seriously frightening how the Karate propaganda has everyone fooled. They're like the new illuminati or something. No wonder you hate them so much. Keep spreading the truth but be careful - they might want to *eliminate you* to cover the conspiracy...
What karate style are you talking about?
Gichin Funakoshi never made a real fight?
Masutatsu Oyama fought only a few times and always with armed struggles.
In fights against another style and only history never with record of photos or videos.
Jon Blumming himself who was a student of Masutatsu Oyama revealed several of his lies in his book and interviews.
don't ask for specifics or evidence you'll just anger him lolLike?