You lack perspective. You think because YOU wouldn't bang a robot girl means that other guys wouldn't either. Clearly not everyone thinks the same way as you do. There are multiple dudes in this very thread saying they would. You're ignoring reality.
Again, if robot Alicia Vikanders were a real thing there would be men lining up around the block to purchase one. You're ignorant on this topic because you assume everyone would act exactly like you.
We are discussing the movie and how the movie uses AI. You are bringing up autopilot which is completely irrelevant to the movie. They didn't bring Caleb in to test autopilot.
This is false:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence
You arent qualified to say any of this. People much smarter than you have been debating it for decades.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Letter_on_Artificial_Intelligence
Fyi, cockroaches have a sense of self-preservation. That's not human level intelligence.
We know so little about consciousness and how the brain works, its laughable that you think you possess the requisite knowledge to be saying what we can and can't accomplish with AI.
You're being argumentative for it's own sake.
I'm saying banging a hunk of metal is a specific fetish and I sincerely doubt anyone in this thread would fuck something that felt like a wrench. I'm saying in context of the film I didn't buy the physical attraction because they showed just how inhuman she was. It's fine that most bought it, I didn't.
Autopilot is relevant because it illustrates how likely it is we aren't discussing the same things. From your aggressive replies, obviously we aren't. One of the articles you linked to expressed beautifully what I was trying to get across: "AI is whatever hasn't been done yet."
You just want to be right and win, while I'm just expressing my opinions. In my opinion, magic AI and consciousness have never been expressed in film in a way that convinced me. Most people are comfortable just taking them for granted and that's fine. I'm not. I'm hungry for someone to make a case for illustrate how machines make the leap to consciousness, and they never do, it just magically happens.
Human level is not a thing. Mimicking human cognition is not a level. It's the process that matters here, not the skill. Once the process is established, the skill will come. Computers are already vastly superior in some areas and pitifully weak in others, as they're simply trying to brute force the process.
As I said, I've watched many lectures on the subject, and there's a general consensus that we're a very long way from achieving the kind of AI we're seeing in movies. One of the biggest hurdles is perception and the fact we don't know how subconscious associations work. Right now they're letting algorithms create themselves through brute force trial and error, because a computer can create millions of them in a very short time. They create a million, test them, keep the best one. They create a million of that one, test, and keep the best one. And so on.
They're getting better and better, and we don't really know why or how, because we're not writing them any more, they are.
This is probably the only chance we're going to see something most would accept as proper AI in our lifetime, through emergence, although it's pretty unlikely as the algorithms are hyper specific and they would have to be combined into some kind of comprehensive "box" as part of a much bigger picture.
In any case, I'm qualified to voice my opinion. It's pretty obnoxious of you to say otherwise.
