jury sides with graffiti artists over building owner

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by stellarborg, Nov 11, 2017.

  1. stellarborg Green Belt

    stellarborg
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,158
    Likes Received:
    979
    A jury has ruled that a real estate developer broke the law by destroying graffiti art in New York City, in a verdict that could provide legal protections for street artists across the US.

    The federal jury made its decision after a group of artists sued Jerry Wolkoff, who painted over their work at the 5Pointz building in Queens, New York City, in November 2013.

    On Wednesday the jury decided that the artists’ work was legally protected under the Visual Artists Rights Act (Vara), and that meant that Wolkoff had broken the law. It was the first time graffiti, or “aerosol art” had been given that protection under federal law, potentially meaning thousands of graffiti murals across the country could now be preserved.

    “It confirms that aerosol art is the same as any other fine artist,” said Eric Baum, the lawyer who represented the 21 artists who sued Wolkoff.

    “And that the artist deserves dignity and respect.”

    The owner of the building originally permitted graffiti artists to decorate his building with graffiti, but then changed his mind when he decided to convert his factory into an apartment complex.

    https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/nov/09/new-york-graffiti-artist-win-lawsuit-5-pointz

    Say what you will but public jury is a great equalizer against business interests
     
    #1
  2. Curmudgeon Purple Belt

    Curmudgeon
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2017
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    8,636
    Are you a chick or something?
     
    #2
  3. Cajun A Cajun Traveler: Something of a Novelty...

    Cajun
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,537
    Likes Received:
    4,291
    Location:
    the stix
  4. JudoThrowFiasco Charming Quark

    JudoThrowFiasco
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2014
    Messages:
    19,842
    Likes Received:
    18,984
    The owner claims he always was going to eventually demo it -- hopefully the judge comes to his senses
     
    #4
  5. HockeyBjj Putting on the foil

    HockeyBjj
    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,078
    Likes Received:
    5,426
    Fuck graffiti "artists". You don't own your medium, you don't get to vandalize it
     
    #5
  6. Broken arrow Purple Belt

    Broken arrow
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    2,347
    Ffs it’s like we are living in bizzarro world
     
    #6
  7. 22k Haiku Expert

    22k
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    26,433
    Likes Received:
    32,243
    Location:
    New York
    this wasn't some random street crap. this was an entire building complex with huge masterpieces & elaborate artwork projects always going up outside for decades, where there where hundreds of art studios inside. it was actually pretty cool & contributed to an awesome scenic subway commute to & from work.
     
    #7
  8. Metusalemi Brown Belt

    Metusalemi
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,694
    Likes Received:
    5,719
    Location:
    Finland
    That'll teach him.
     
    #8
    Ayin, PolishHeadlock, Skulli and 2 others like this.
  9. silus_2000 Gold Belt

    silus_2000
    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    23,337
    Likes Received:
    18,637
    No chance of any building owner allowing this to happen seeing this is a potential end result.
     
    #9
    rpn453, S-dot, PolishHeadlock and 3 others like this.
  10. Bald1 War Room Can

    Bald1
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    10,495
    Likes Received:
    16,246
    Location:
    Canada
    Sounds pretty cool. But did the artists own the building?
     
    #10
    Starman, Seano, splendica and 13 others like this.
  11. 22k Haiku Expert

    22k
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    26,433
    Likes Received:
    32,243
    Location:
    New York
    nah, that one guy Jerry Wolkoff did who I believe was a huge fan of street art/ graffiti etc.
     
    #11
  12. JudoThrowFiasco Charming Quark

    JudoThrowFiasco
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2014
    Messages:
    19,842
    Likes Received:
    18,984
    They should've of pooled their money, formed a co-op and bought the building.

    Owner said he was always going to demo it.
     
    #12
  13. 22k Haiku Expert

    22k
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    26,433
    Likes Received:
    32,243
    Location:
    New York

    he didn't give them formal notice supposedly, hence why he lost.
     
    #13
  14. JudoThrowFiasco Charming Quark

    JudoThrowFiasco
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2014
    Messages:
    19,842
    Likes Received:
    18,984
    Didn't lose -- judge hasn't ruled. And was there a contract? He let them paint his building -- but it's his building.

    Street artist should learn to invest in their own real estate
     
    #14
  15. oldshadow Gold Belt

    oldshadow
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    24,117
    Likes Received:
    8,774
    Location:
    Virginia U.S.A.
    The end result is no property owner will now let anyone "decorate" their building.
     
    #15
    Starman, ShinkanPo, BJ@LW&WW and 7 others like this.
  16. 22k Haiku Expert

    22k
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    26,433
    Likes Received:
    32,243
    Location:
    New York
    whoops missed that part.

    anyways, I don't understand your train of thought here.

    I'm not defending the artists nor am I arguing against them. all I did was share that this wasn't a typical & trashy graffiti thing, & that it has history here in Queens.

    telling me artists should own such & such is irrelevant to any point I've made.
     
    #16
    Essie, Anung Un Rama and tonni like this.
  17. JudoThrowFiasco Charming Quark

    JudoThrowFiasco
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2014
    Messages:
    19,842
    Likes Received:
    18,984
    Cool that it wasn't trashy -- and cool if that was the extent of your point.

    But on the topic at hand, and the one you addressed bald1 on, the aesthetics don't really mean much.
     
    #17
  18. 22k Haiku Expert

    22k
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    26,433
    Likes Received:
    32,243
    Location:
    New York
    <{vega}>

    I was replying @HockeyBjj 's post, & how this isn't a case with typical & trashy vandalizing styled graffiti.
     
    #18
    Anung Un Rama and tonni like this.
  19. JudoThrowFiasco Charming Quark

    JudoThrowFiasco
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2014
    Messages:
    19,842
    Likes Received:
    18,984
    Sorry, noticed how you replied to bald on the follow up.

    And again, im just reiterating that the skill level of the art isn't a factor. To some people, all graffiti is trashy -- due to the illicity of it
     
    #19
    bufetadanacara likes this.
  20. 22k Haiku Expert

    22k
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    26,433
    Likes Received:
    32,243
    Location:
    New York

    all good, but your second point is irrelevant because it wasn't all graffiti, although most of it was. they always had elaborate murals etc. & other art style pieces. hence why this entire thing is holding water in court.
     
    #20
    Anung Un Rama and tonni like this.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "fd5733925866a04e50edd70f38dfaa35"
monitoring_string = "603ac9fff68f23709f2a42bf5e29272b"