Jury refuses to convict in Nevada ranch standoff

SammyJar88

MAGA!!!
@purple
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
471
Jury refuses to convict in Nevada ranch standoff

LAS VEGAS — A federal jury in Las Vegas refused Tuesday to convict four accused gunman in a 2014 standoff with federal authorities near the Nevada ranch of states' rights figure Cliven Bundy.

In a verdict that delivered a stunning setback to federal prosecutors, the jury acquitted Ricky Lovelien and Steven Stewart of all 10 charges against them.

Defendants Scott Drexler and Eric Parker were found not guilty of most charges against them. The jury did not reach verdicts on four charges against Parker and two charges against Drexler.

The results stunned a courtroom full of the defendants' supporters, many of whom broke into applause after Chief U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro ordered Lovelien and Stewart freed immediately.

The judge set a hearing Wednesday to decide whether to free Parker and Drexler pending a decision by prosecutors whether to try them for a third time.

Prosecutors said the men conspired with Bundy family members and wielded weapons to threaten the lives of federal agents enforcing lawful court orders to remove Bundy cattle from public land after he failed to pay grazing fees.

Each man standing trial in Las Vegas faced 10 charges including conspiracy, interstate travel in aid of extortion, weapon possession and assault and threatening a federal officer.

Combined, the counts carried the possibility of more than 100 years in federal prison.

The four were among 19 men arrested in early 2016, nearly two years after the confrontation near the rural town of Bunkerville, about 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas.

All 19 remained in federal custody, despite pleas from family members and attorneys for the release of those who have not been brought to trial. Bundy's attorney, Bret Whipple, notes that his client is now 71.

Bundy stopped paying grazing fees decades ago, saying he refused to recognize federal authority over public land where he said his family grazed cattle since before the U.S. Bureau of Land Management was created.

The dispute has roots a nearly half-century fight over public lands in Nevada and the West, where the federal government controls vast expanses of land.

Calls for action have grown louder and more frequent in recent years with internet bloggers protesting federal agency decisions to designate protected areas for endangered species and set aside tracts for mining, wind farms and natural gas exploration.

Prosecutors characterize the standoff as an armed uprising by self-styled militia members who answered a Bundy family call to take up arms to prevent the lawful enforcement of multiple court orders to remove Bundy cattle from what is now the Gold Butte National Monument.

Defense attorneys cast the tense standoff as an ultimately peaceful protest involving people upset about aggressive tactics used by federal land managers and contract cowboys.

They point to skirmishes days earlier involving armed federal agents using dogs and stun guns against Bundy family members; the closure of a vast range half the size of the state of Delaware to collect Bundy's cattle; and corrals set up as protest "First Amendment zone" protest areas for people.

A first trial earlier this year involved men who carried guns, but who prosecutors characterized as the least culpable of the co-defendants. It lasted two months and ended in April with a jury unable to reach verdicts for the four men, while finding two other defendants guilty of some charges.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ju...standoff/ar-AAqyUl1?li=AA4ZnC&ocid=spartanntp
 
so all these people armed with guns and nobody died? guess Antifa was busy that month.
 
unsurprising

the whole thing was a clusterfuck, but the bundys tapped into peoples outrage at an ever growing government swinging its authority around, even if he shouldve paid grazing fees, he became a symbol for something larger
 
the media makes these people out to be the problem when people are walking through the streets with axes and throwing feces bombs at people
 
Let me guess one nutter hold out on the jury? Jury nullification is fun and games when it done to free folks you like.
 
I don't know how influential these guys were in the grand scheme of things. They convicted and sentenced one of them a month ago to 60+ years in prison. The big deal will be the trial coming up which involves the Bundy's themselves. Hopefully they will be convicted and thrown in prison for the miserable felons that they are.

But after they were somehow acquitted in Oregon for what they did I'm not all that confident.
 
Time for the feds to move in and execute the court order.
 
Let me guess one nutter hold out on the jury? Jury nullification is fun and games when it done to free folks you like.

The Bundys have overwhelming support from Nevadans. I did not know a single person who did not support the Bundys when all this shit was happening. The only ones who don't are the people that moved here from California.
 
Jury refuses to convict in Nevada ranch standoff

LAS VEGAS — A federal jury in Las Vegas refused Tuesday to convict four accused gunman in a 2014 standoff with federal authorities near the Nevada ranch of states' rights figure Cliven Bundy.

In a verdict that delivered a stunning setback to federal prosecutors, the jury acquitted Ricky Lovelien and Steven Stewart of all 10 charges against them.

Defendants Scott Drexler and Eric Parker were found not guilty of most charges against them. The jury did not reach verdicts on four charges against Parker and two charges against Drexler.

The results stunned a courtroom full of the defendants' supporters, many of whom broke into applause after Chief U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro ordered Lovelien and Stewart freed immediately.

The judge set a hearing Wednesday to decide whether to free Parker and Drexler pending a decision by prosecutors whether to try them for a third time.

Prosecutors said the men conspired with Bundy family members and wielded weapons to threaten the lives of federal agents enforcing lawful court orders to remove Bundy cattle from public land after he failed to pay grazing fees.

Each man standing trial in Las Vegas faced 10 charges including conspiracy, interstate travel in aid of extortion, weapon possession and assault and threatening a federal officer.

Combined, the counts carried the possibility of more than 100 years in federal prison.

The four were among 19 men arrested in early 2016, nearly two years after the confrontation near the rural town of Bunkerville, about 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas.

All 19 remained in federal custody, despite pleas from family members and attorneys for the release of those who have not been brought to trial. Bundy's attorney, Bret Whipple, notes that his client is now 71.

Bundy stopped paying grazing fees decades ago, saying he refused to recognize federal authority over public land where he said his family grazed cattle since before the U.S. Bureau of Land Management was created.

The dispute has roots a nearly half-century fight over public lands in Nevada and the West, where the federal government controls vast expanses of land.

Calls for action have grown louder and more frequent in recent years with internet bloggers protesting federal agency decisions to designate protected areas for endangered species and set aside tracts for mining, wind farms and natural gas exploration.

Prosecutors characterize the standoff as an armed uprising by self-styled militia members who answered a Bundy family call to take up arms to prevent the lawful enforcement of multiple court orders to remove Bundy cattle from what is now the Gold Butte National Monument.

Defense attorneys cast the tense standoff as an ultimately peaceful protest involving people upset about aggressive tactics used by federal land managers and contract cowboys.

They point to skirmishes days earlier involving armed federal agents using dogs and stun guns against Bundy family members; the closure of a vast range half the size of the state of Delaware to collect Bundy's cattle; and corrals set up as protest "First Amendment zone" protest areas for people.

A first trial earlier this year involved men who carried guns, but who prosecutors characterized as the least culpable of the co-defendants. It lasted two months and ended in April with a jury unable to reach verdicts for the four men, while finding two other defendants guilty of some charges.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ju...standoff/ar-AAqyUl1?li=AA4ZnC&ocid=spartanntp

I'd say some of those charges were a stretch to begin with, but other than that juries are full of people to dumb to get out of jury duty; so no verdicts surprise me either way.
 
I have a feeling "antifa" won't be celebrating because resisting the government stops being cool when you're a rural gunowner with valid reasons. Irony is their fetish.
 
Time for the feds to move in and execute the court order.

Ya that is what they do in totalitarian countries. Here, you get judged by your peers and if they not guilty then the government only would prove Bundy's point if they defied the peoples will.
 
Ya that is what they do in totalitarian countries. Here, you get judged by your peers and if they not guilty then the government only would prove Bundy's point if they defied the peoples will.
Fine to continue to break the law if it makes you feel good, like the Bundys, right?
 
The federal government owns a crazy amount of land. Something like one eighth of our national territory. They should sell it off rather than harassing ranchers.

The BLM is the corrupt bankers hiring nasty gunslingers to chase ranchers off the land in pretty much every Western ever.
 
The federal government owns a crazy amount of land. Something like one eighth of our national territory. They should sell it off rather than harassing ranchers.

The BLM is the corrupt bankers hiring nasty gunslingers to chase ranchers off the land in pretty much every Western ever.
 
Fine to continue to break the law if it makes you feel good, like the Bundys, right?

I don't think you understand our system of law. In America the jury is the ultimate arbiter of guilt of innocence. Second, it is understood that every once in awhile a situation occurs that is outside the scope of what the law's drafters contemplated. Thus, the jury is allowed to nullify the law in individual circumstances to serve justice. That is par and parcel of our legal system.
 
Back
Top