Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by KazDibiase, Sep 13, 2017.
Whoa-oa-oa! I feel good, I knew that I would, now
I feel good, I knew that I would, now
So good, so good, I got you
Fair,but Jones still the better fighter.
If DC had been roided too he might have beat him...
Tough to call Jones better considering that
Mike perry bless
Fighters should get a % of the opponents purse. Something like 50%, no way in hell someone will give me brain damage and just get off with a small fine. Or do they already do something like this?
I thought the usada release stated that jones would have due process before conclusions were drawn. This is a conclusion
Everyone is on steroids
hard to say. Roided up, snorting coke and popping dick pills like pez candies - yes the better fighter. Clean??? We will never know. Thanks JOJO
Good. The win was tainted, next step is giving DC his belt back.
What does "overturned" mean? No Contest?
Does the champ retain on a NC?
Also you should flip their ages.
Jones older, Jones not roided and DC young/roided? DC by whooping ass.
I'm guessing this is the first time in UFC history this happens? I know it would have happened in Chael vs Anderson I if Chael had won.
I'd love to see what kind of beast a juiced up DC would be. He'd look like a huge Woodley. No racist
His due process will be in regard to why there were steroids in his system, no if.
2nd sample also positive, so regardless of why, he was on steroids during the fight, so overturning the result is correct.
If the commission believes his dick pill/ tainted creatine/ whatever during hearings, he could get reduced penalty, but that doesn't change the decision on the fight outcome.
His B sample was tested, and that was positive as well. What more can you do?