Sure.
There are basically no old-style socially conservative communists left in existence, and most of the far left from SJWs (i don't care for the term, but I'll use it for shorthand) to communists, even Stalin/Mao fetishists, are libertarian in principle. Yet these factions are growingly amenable, whether consciously or not, to forming these sort of jacobin clubs that we are seeing develop in regard to certain political issues.
For the SJWs, it may take the form of undercutting due process of alleged sexual brutes to cauterize a climate of sexual abuse. For the communists, it may take the form of undermining the democratic process to box out plutocrats that take advantage of it. Neither group sees those means as ethical in themselves, but instead seems them as necessarily unethical rebuttals to existing unethical realities that must be counteracted at some cost. The end product would be an environment in which sexual abuse doesn't happen, or in which the democratic process is strengthened by more evenly distributed political voice.
Meanwhile, the right's authoritarian streak, which spans from Southern style moral traditionalists to the "alt right," seems to view the authoritarian element as ethical in itself, as it reinforces inherently ethical behavior and thought, and refocuses political actors towards an objectivist-style meritocratic reality where there are two genders, one god, and everyone goes to work and the only people who suffer are the criminal and the lazy. That rationale, at least to my eye, is what underpins the right wing's (newfound?) amenability to autocracy that was discovered in some poll recently. It may have been from WashPo.
I apologize if that was kinda opaque. I've had a few.