- Joined
- Oct 4, 2010
- Messages
- 1,072
- Reaction score
- 0
I asked that because if you've already been good for a while, your frame of reference might be a little skewed IMHO. Actually mine might, I'm not sure which is true. I'm a brown belt. I was a white belt for 8 months, a blue belt for just over a year, and purple for about 15 months. I've been a brown belt for a year and half but the last sixth months I haven't trained but a few times due to illness. For me, being in the phase where I can make significant, immediate gains by learning more technical detail is part of my very recent memory, so that might have something to do with it.
Of course being sharp with your execution is of the utmost importance; Rodolfo doesn't hit the torreando and half guard smash on everyone just because he knows more (although he almost certainly does), he gets it because his execution is precise, better timed, and more perfect. Perhaps this is the crux of our disagreement, but to me an integral part of having good technique is the ability to apply it under stress against good opponents. Knowledge not backed by practice is not validated.
Still, even as I've gotten a lot better, certain circumstances have led me to believe that technique is still imminently important. Consider this: Before I started getting sick, one of my main training partners was a regional competitor of some note who has recently switched teams and had slumping results lately. Regardless, he has more or less made a career out of letting people get a crossface in half guard, only to go to deep half and elevate them anyway. Although we are taught that this is wrong, I have to this day never seen anyone stop him with a crossface without the gi. When I started training with him though, that was a big part of my game: the reverse sit in half guard, with or without the crossface. So how was I to go about solving this problem? He ate me up with the same sequence over and over. My game was inferior. It had holes in it and I could do nothing to stop the sequences from happening, even when I knew how they worked. Drilling to sharpen the tools I had wasn't going to work. I had to start using new techniques and making major modifications to my old ones, and only then did I ever see any success. How did I do that? Through exhaustive study, trial and error, and yes, lots of drilling. All of those things, IMO, should not be looked at as independent of one another. For me, the relationship isn't just symbiotic, it is essential.
I'm sure you've had training partners like this in your development as well, people against whom your current game wasn't going to cut it. How did you overcome those obstacles?
Of course being sharp with your execution is of the utmost importance; Rodolfo doesn't hit the torreando and half guard smash on everyone just because he knows more (although he almost certainly does), he gets it because his execution is precise, better timed, and more perfect. Perhaps this is the crux of our disagreement, but to me an integral part of having good technique is the ability to apply it under stress against good opponents. Knowledge not backed by practice is not validated.
Still, even as I've gotten a lot better, certain circumstances have led me to believe that technique is still imminently important. Consider this: Before I started getting sick, one of my main training partners was a regional competitor of some note who has recently switched teams and had slumping results lately. Regardless, he has more or less made a career out of letting people get a crossface in half guard, only to go to deep half and elevate them anyway. Although we are taught that this is wrong, I have to this day never seen anyone stop him with a crossface without the gi. When I started training with him though, that was a big part of my game: the reverse sit in half guard, with or without the crossface. So how was I to go about solving this problem? He ate me up with the same sequence over and over. My game was inferior. It had holes in it and I could do nothing to stop the sequences from happening, even when I knew how they worked. Drilling to sharpen the tools I had wasn't going to work. I had to start using new techniques and making major modifications to my old ones, and only then did I ever see any success. How did I do that? Through exhaustive study, trial and error, and yes, lots of drilling. All of those things, IMO, should not be looked at as independent of one another. For me, the relationship isn't just symbiotic, it is essential.
I'm sure you've had training partners like this in your development as well, people against whom your current game wasn't going to cut it. How did you overcome those obstacles?