- Joined
- Jul 21, 2014
- Messages
- 10,664
- Reaction score
- 4,606
It's an issue that's really separate from abortion as it's really about having words mean something.
???
Pro abortion stance pretends there is no life prior to birth.
It's an issue that's really separate from abortion as it's really about having words mean something.
Stephen Hawking should have been killed in the womb.
Hawkins was over 20 years old before his (extremely rare) disease started to gradually paralyse him. For most people it occurs after 60 years of age.
He was just unlucky, not genetically "defected". If he had been paralysed from birth, then he probably wouldn't have been Stephen Hawking, but would've lived a much more miserable existence. The reason why he was able to excel, is because he was a fully educated, physically adult man by the time the degenerative disease took hold.
The success stories among people who were fucked from birth, are much more scarce.
Unlucky? Is that a scientific or medical term? Anyone with a serious defect is unlucky.
His body was a cage. He was defective .
Point being that in most people the disease occurs at 50-60 years of age. Hawking was an extremely rare exception, in that his physical degeneration started in his 20's. But even then, he had lived to be a full adult before being incapacitated.
We're talking about people being incapacitated at birth, not when they are adults. In most scenarios, Hawking would've lived a good 50-60 years before the disease took hold.
Obviously there's no reason to abort someone who has got a very high chance of living to retirement age before encountering any problems.
How many people are worth killing to sacrifice one Stephen Hawking? Give me a number. Cuz I say one great man is worth more than a million regular men.
Stephen Hawking was suffering while he did great work. From his wheelchair.
Let's properly scale this. About production and suffering. Let us use the living. You should all be killed because you are massively defective compared to Bill Gates. You may as well be retarded compared to him. You aren't even of the same species. Why should people like you be allowed to live? You are a drain who have brought nothing great to this world. Not made a single dent in it. You have no reason to exist. You are superfluous.
How are we all massively defective compared to Bill Gates? Because he has more money?
Contrary to what you might think, he's no more intelligent that most men. In fact, he was probably a more rudimentary programmer than what I am. The programs he developed were laughable in modern terms. But where he separated himself from others, was as a businessman who seized opportunities and stole other people's ideas.
Nothing separates me, or most people in the War Room, from Bill Gates. He was born only a man, like the rest of us. We do not have crippling afflictions that prevent us from enjoying daily life and from exploring possibilities. Some make better choices than others, but they still have those choices to make.
If Hawking had been born crippled from birth, he would not have been anything. He probably would not have lived a year. Bringing him up in this case is meaningless because he was never born with a serious, crippling defect.
Oh god, you are trying to rationalize how Bill Gates is not better than you. We are done here.
He is not. By your American standards, sure. He sure possesses more capital. But based on my own standards, all he is doing is leaving a bigger pile of shit behind himself, than I ever will. So on those terms, I do not really rate him above me.
Your standards are meaningless. lol at American standards. by world standards. Him and Steve Jobs are loved from here to China. I also love how people nitpick the technical skills of the two greatest tech guys of our generation. lol. Never gets old. They are just mediocre guys who got lucky and ripped people off. That is why you will never be them. With that shit attitude.
I do not aspire to be them. I've made it quite clear that I despise the turn that the world is taking, at the hands of the men that you seem to be infatuated with. Why should I put a man on a pedestal, when I despise the results of his work?
And yes, their technical skills were rudimentary at best.
Hawkins was over 20 years old before his (extremely rare) disease started to gradually paralyse him. For most people it occurs after 60 years of age.
He was just unlucky, not genetically "defected". If he had been paralysed from birth, then he probably wouldn't have been Stephen Hawking, but would've lived a much more miserable existence. The reason why he was able to excel, is because he was a fully educated, physically adult man by the time the degenerative disease took hold.
The success stories among people who were fucked from birth, are much more scarce.
Contrary to what you might think, he's no more intelligent that most men. In fact, he was probably a more rudimentary programmer than what I am. The programs he developed were laughable in modern terms. But where he separated himself from others, was as a businessman who seized opportunities and stole other people's ideas.
That's good. Because they control the world and you don't. Your kind is not needed.
Why should I put an average fuck like you on pedestal over a retard? You are just differing degrees of small.
They do not control anything. Jobs is dead, and Gates is hardly what I would call a political player. Most crook third world strong-men who control an entire country's resources, probably have more money stashed, than he does.
I never claimed that you need to put me on a pedestal. No man should be. We are all differing degrees of small, or big, depending on how you prefer to look at it.
What we are speaking about, are the situations where even the smallest and the most meager possibilities are not available to us, and when all that remains is the possibility of suffering and a painful end.