@HockeyBjj
But I would also say in instances like this, or stadiums, it is much more easier to tie to guaranteed short term and long term growth to them. The tax subsidies are contingent on guaranteed infrastructure and jobs that will remain for decades to come.
But blanket cuts with no guarantees for everyone just make deficits. I would be more in support of corporate tax cuts if they were contingent on wage growth at a specific corporation... but giving them a shit load of money with no contingencies just means you're giving them a shitload of money with no contingencies.