Is it too early to consider Conor the greatest LW of all time?

SocialJusticeFighter

Double Yellow Card
Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
680
Reaction score
0
There haven't been a lot of really dominant lightweight Champs so I think if you factor conors featherweight and welterweight wins into the equation you can already consider him the greatest lightweight of all time. Who agrees?
 
Yup. Too early. Relax there sparky

1 win in UFC LW division

1-1 vs LW Nate in bs non weight cutting LW matches in which he was KOed and choked out in his loss and won via decision.


But by all means, troll on "social justice fighter"
 
lol he's fought in the division once and isn't even the FW goat
 
He has proven that he can beat Eddie Alvarez at LW. That is it. Give me a fucking break.
 
Too early. But he's on his way. At this point in his career at (how old is he again? 29?) his age, he's probably got the most potential to beat the others. Or at least more potential than they had at this point in their careers.
 
When-You-Run-Old-Friend-Make-Plans-Hang-Out-Sometime-Walk-Away.gif
 
He never defended his belt.

Nick diaz at this point(retired) is more legit than connor
 
dreams.gif


I almost feel bad for using this again in a Mcgregor thread but it is so accurate.
 
Back
Top