- Joined
- Jun 17, 2015
- Messages
- 3,037
- Reaction score
- 0
I've been in a lot of fights like what Badger67 is describing. Or, I should say, I used to when I was a bit younger. I prefer grappling in an altercation now as it's less likely for me to end up in handcuffs along with the other guy at the end of it.
I've had a small hole poked in me in a fight before, been slashed a couple times. Successfully managed to get a knife off the other person on occasion a couple times; both of which I used some form of grappling to keep myself safe and get the knife away. I've also been bottled, and bottled other people too many times to even count. Broke a guys collarbone then smashed my glass in his face and used the base of the glass to fuck up his front teeth. Used bats on people, including a bat I used to have when I was teenager which had barbed wire wrapped around the end of it, almost always had knuckle dusters on me and never thought twice about using them. Beat a guy with a tyre iron a little bit. Stomped and been stomped, all that good shit.
(Yeah I've lived in some rough neighbourhoods too, in their own right...)
Thing is, looking back at all of the various situations I can recall there wasn't a single one that couldn't have been handled by grappling in some way, shape or form. And I coudl have saved myself a bunch of trouble, hassle and losses of freedom to boot. Seems to me it's best to only escalate violence as much as you need to do in order to make it out of the situation swiftly and safely. Beating someone's face into tomato paste is simply unnecessary. And now, knowing this through learning the hard way and having to face consequences and retribution on occasion it does stand out to me a lot how many so-called "self-defense" systems advertised to people out there are basically promising somebody a way to do just that. Beat the everloving shit out of the bad guys, and live out all your wildest Walter Mitty/Straw Dogs fantasies while FEARING NO MAN etc. It seems like a bad idea.
The point and purpose of self defense is self preservation, is it not?
I've had a small hole poked in me in a fight before, been slashed a couple times. Successfully managed to get a knife off the other person on occasion a couple times; both of which I used some form of grappling to keep myself safe and get the knife away. I've also been bottled, and bottled other people too many times to even count. Broke a guys collarbone then smashed my glass in his face and used the base of the glass to fuck up his front teeth. Used bats on people, including a bat I used to have when I was teenager which had barbed wire wrapped around the end of it, almost always had knuckle dusters on me and never thought twice about using them. Beat a guy with a tyre iron a little bit. Stomped and been stomped, all that good shit.
(Yeah I've lived in some rough neighbourhoods too, in their own right...)
Thing is, looking back at all of the various situations I can recall there wasn't a single one that couldn't have been handled by grappling in some way, shape or form. And I coudl have saved myself a bunch of trouble, hassle and losses of freedom to boot. Seems to me it's best to only escalate violence as much as you need to do in order to make it out of the situation swiftly and safely. Beating someone's face into tomato paste is simply unnecessary. And now, knowing this through learning the hard way and having to face consequences and retribution on occasion it does stand out to me a lot how many so-called "self-defense" systems advertised to people out there are basically promising somebody a way to do just that. Beat the everloving shit out of the bad guys, and live out all your wildest Walter Mitty/Straw Dogs fantasies while FEARING NO MAN etc. It seems like a bad idea.
The point and purpose of self defense is self preservation, is it not?