- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
- Messages
- 18,184
- Reaction score
- 11,953
The globalists are doing false-flag terror attacks to trick you into closing your borders...
Because that would.... Globalize the... Wait...
420 bro
I have zero doubt that secret service agents were told to look in the other direction, regarding many potential terrorists who are allowed to roam freely, in order to keep up a steady stream of terror attacks in Europe which would not only excuse continued interventionist Middle Eastern policies, but also the gradual unification of European nations into a single structure.
Terror attacks are being used as the main reason to form a united European army and secret services, by the EU lobby.
No politician is stupid enough (outside of perhaps some Marxist loons) to think that taking in millions of people from an active war zone, with high levels of terrorist activity, doesn't greatly decrease national security. But that was the entire point. National security must be replaced by federal security. EU, which engineered this crisis through its open borders policies, is using these continued terror attacks to discredit the abilities of sovereign nations to take care of themselves, despite of course, the most sovereign of all European nations (such as Hungary or Poland) having zero problems with terrorism. Only those countries which are fully on board with the EU agenda, are being screwed.
It sounds chilling that the lives of all these people being lost was calculated from the beginning, but there is no doubt that they were. The hundreds being killed in terror attacks, the thousands of women raped, the tens of thousands of civilians being targeted by immigrant crime sprees, the hundreds of thousands losing their livelihoods to third world labourers, were all calculated moves on the chess board, from the moment it all began.
We have so much data, so many statistics, nowadays, to analyze, to predict accurately, to point us into the right direction. All these deaths, if not outright pre-meditated, were atleast highly anticipated among top officials. And again, they were acceptable "losses" considering the gain.
Last edited: