- Joined
- Jul 10, 2007
- Messages
- 38,153
- Reaction score
- 40,627
You forgot this part of my post:
"not to mention all of the other impressive accomplishments of Jordan."
Winning championships is not enough for determining individual greatness but it is an important factor. Considering all of the great players in the history of the NBA while measuring greatness is subjective I think that at the bare minimum they need to be regarded as a team leader and we should look at their career stats along with individuals accomplishments such as being Rookie of the Year, Regular Season MVP, Finals MVP, Number of Championships Won and Win/Loss ratio as champion. Michael Jordan has Lebron James beat in a lot of categories. I don't buy the "Jordan played on a better team" argument either. That definitely holds for the Jordan era Chicago Bulls when they won their championships vs. the Cleveland Cavaliers today or when they got swept by the Spurs but what about the Miami Heat when Lebron played for them? He still lost two NBA Finals. Jordan would have been even more dominant with that team. Jordan didn't have a good enough team around him to beat the Boston Celtics during the 1980s or have a realistic chance of winning an NBA championship until Scottie Pippen joined the team and Phil Jackson became head coach. Soon after that they were virtually unstoppable. Also if Jordan's father hadn't been murdered and he didn't retire early from Basketball I believe the Bulls could have won 8 or more championships in a row with Jordan. So long as he and the rest of the team stayed healthy Jordan would have been focused and kept winning until he got too old to play. Who knows maybe they could have beaten the Celtics most consecutive championships record. But as history stands right now while Lebron James has some very respectable accomplishments I believe that Michael Jordan can easily be viewed as the better player based on career accomplishment.
Literally nobody read this.