I have not insulted you in any way. You have now resorted to attempting to insult and belittle me, instead of making an effort to express your view/opinion. Either you have no point, or you are incapable of expressing it properly. Your insults were ineffective and simply make you look like a child, in which case your crappy trolling bounces off me and sticks to you. Because you are glue.
We don't know how much money Michael made in this fight. We assume he made a lot, and we assume GSP made a lot.
However, if Bisping had that trilogy in the UK, or defended against Romero in the UK, how do we know those fights would have made substantially less than the GSP fight?
I understand GSP was a lot of money. But if money is the goal, why not fight more when holding the belt? We know champions make more money when they fight vs not being champion. So how much money did Bisping lose by not fighting Romero or Rockhold or Whittaker?
You can break this comment down to this: "I can't beat Romero/Whittaker/Rockhold so I've got to hold out for the GSP fight as long as I can."
If Bisping believed he was the best fighter in the division and that he could beat those guys, wouldn't he have taken those fights in the meantime while GSP was preparing to return?
Why does it have to be one or the other? There's a reason for that. Is it because he knew he couldn't beat those guys and would thus lose the GSP fight?
1 fight in 17 months against #13 ranked.
Can now take 3 fights in 5 months.
That is unusual.