Sorry for inferring that . . . regardless you seemed to be using that less common practice to characterize the larger group of Christians.
Not my intention at all.
I was only trying to point out that such beliefs exist.
Sorry for inferring that . . . regardless you seemed to be using that less common practice to characterize the larger group of Christians.
Lol...so textbook and predictable. ..i havehaven't lied once about your position.
You claim to be for SSM. This is true, right?
Look at every post of yours in this thread and all other threads regarding gay marriage. You state arguments In opposition to gay marriage. This is also an accurate assessment, correct?
So...please tell me how I'm distorting your position. ..
And don't cop out and say, "...this is pointless blah blah blah..."
Try again homie.
I would have more respect for you if you would just state your position and not dance with semantics. Your shtick is well documented and nobody believes it. I may be an asshole but if my feet are held to the fire, so to speak, I will state my position. The fact that you don't makes you an incredible hack.
Well of course . . . because m52nickerson says so . . .
Sigh. The problem is the end result and special accommodations needed for many of these cases. Specifically the overnight trips and events where chaperones are required.
Guess we just seem to be hearing about stuff more then . . .
Really? So each state prints their own currency? We all benefit from a National infrastructure supported by our taxes. The management of that infrastructure may be at different levels but it's ultimately supported by the exact same currency.
Too bad it's often taken out of context . . . but I get your point.
Actually no I didn't bring it up. Quote it. Have you noticed that most of what you say is not truthful?
Again I'm arguing that gay marriage is not a civil right nit that ssm shouldn't be allowed.
Why won't you acknowledge this? That would be the intellectually honest thing to do ya know.
I'm not really trying to convince you guys of anything. Think what you want. All I ask is that you respond to the arguments presented and not what you think I really think.
Not my intention at all.
I was only trying to point out that such beliefs exist.
I dint argue against ssm...i argue against it being a civil right. That's how. Why can't you just acknowledge that? Oh that's right, you're busy trying to "get me" on something.
Okay, you did not bring it up. You just ran with it for many pages and multiple days.
You are also arguing that it should not be made legal in by the courts. A position that you know would result in it not being made legal.
You have also been shown that it does fit the definition of a civil right and have yet to provide anything to show it is not. When I asked you how it was not a civil right you have no answer.
I acknowlege that is what you are claiming, but I nor most people with brains are not going to believe it.
So you once again accused me of something that wasn't true? Just want to get that on the record.
I actually don't know that. I think polls are showing that a majority of Americans support SSM.
Are we talking how things are legally or what is right, wrong, fair, or unfair regardless of what the law says?
I'm referring to the latter in which case I've provided plenty of arguments for why it shouldn't be considered a civil right.
All I'm claiming is that I'm making a certain argument. You've acknowledged that I have been making this argument. Now you claim you're not going believe I'm making this argument? Do you even know what you're talking about anymore?
Inbreeding never became "wrong" in biology. I've not suggested that evolution or nature has a stance on the rightness or wrongness of inbreeding, that would be stupid. Nice false equivalency though.Just curious as to when inbreeding (incest) became wrong in biology. I mean incest led to all the life we see on this planet today and now it's bad? Clearly something changed. So when did biology change?
I'd say evolution leads to inconsistencies and ambiguity as to what's good or bad.:icon_idea
Nope. Abortions are rather difficult to get these days and both because of that, better sex ed, family planning, etc. abortions have been steadily declining for two decades.I'd say teen births are down due more to the fact that women go to college and have careers these days. We also have abortion on demand.
Because you often change your argument mid-stream whenever your lack of logic and consistency is laid bare.I dint argue against ssm...i argue against it being a civil right. That's how. Why can't you just acknowledge that? Oh that's right, you're busy trying to "get me" on something.