- Joined
- Jun 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,075
- Reaction score
- 1
It's not trolling. He is that dumb.BoxingisLife is back with his weak trolling
It's not trolling. He is that dumb.BoxingisLife is back with his weak trolling
Romero dropped him, out landed him by 30 strikes and did about 3 trip take downs while controlling 95% of the round
If thats not a 10-8 then I dont know what is
Romero dropped him, out landed him by 30 strikes and did about 3 trip take downs while controlling 95% of the round
If thats not a 10-8 then I dont know what is
I’d like to know what were the numbers in round one. How many strikes did rob and Romero land? Could anyone point me in the direction please?
What you have to consider is this: that same night mike Jackson got a 10-8 for very little and yoel did not in a round where he knocked Whittaker down, took him down three times and almost had him finished twice...Im truly flabbergasted
Romero dropped Whittaker, and then the rest of the round was Whittaker holding on to a single, Romero riding the back, or both battling for position in the clinch
Where is this fake news coming from that Romero beat Whitaker from corner to corner while scoring multiple knockdowns?
Under no criteria was it a 10-8 round
It wasn't a round where a fighter had total and absolute full control from a very dominant position for the entirety of the round ala Shogun's round 5 against Hendo (Shogun was robbed of a DRAW)
It wasnt a round where a fighter was dropped numerous times and had an absolute striking clinic put on them ala Conor's massacre striking clinic on Nate in round 2 of their rematch (Conor was robbed blind of a clear cut dominant UD decision over Nate)
There was NOTHING about Romero's round 5 that ever consistuted a legit 10-8 round, no matter the criteria you try to use.
Just goes to show you how many were brainwashed by Rogan's insanely biased commentary
Remember, all MMA fights are scored round by round, so based on the actual scoring criteria, the only correct decision was Whittaker 48-47. Judges were actually bang on spot on with this fight. Super super super close fight, but a fight that Romero in no way deserved to actually win
For all the talk about 10-8s, how ABOUT WHITTAKER'S round 1. Whittaker out struck Romero in the numbers by some crazy amount in that round.
The only possible other round is the third.Round 5 wasn’t the only round Yoel won that deserved a 10-8
Robert did a much better job fighting back. He took way more punishment and still had success in the round. That is the difference. One man got beat from bell to bell. One man did not, dispite taking more punishment.What you have to consider is this: that same night mike Jackson got a 10-8 for very little and yoel did not in a round where he knocked Whittaker down, took him down three times and almost had him finished twice...
That's who the op is? I knew his style seemed familiar, but I couldn't figure out who.BoxingisLife is back with his weak trolling
Have You?You clearly haven't read the new rules on 10-8s.
I thought that to lol. If round 5 is a 10-8 how ain't 1.Round 1 was a 10/8 for Whittaker since Yoel did absolutely nothing and Whittaker landed like 40 significant strikes.
I quickly went from unaware of to quickly skipping over his postsBoxingisLife is back with his weak trolling
I know the arguement you are trying to make but the problem is that one of those rounds he competely turtled up and wasn't even fighting back he just was doing that thing where the only place open is the back of the head. One of the rounds he really didn't fight back. He got back up and then was almost tkod along the fenceRobert did a much better job fighting back. He took way more punishment and still had success in the round. That is the difference. One man got beat from bell to bell. One man did not, dispite taking more punishment.